[UK-CONTEST] CQ WW SSB Contest.

[Roger Western]

Yes, Derek, CQWW does software checks which do exactly that: algorithms have 
been built over time with statistical limits (number of mults worked within 
n minutes of a Cluster spot appearing) which are applied to all high-scoring 
non-assisted logs. The outliers are clearly visible. You have read in the 
write-ups of previous CQWW contests that many stations are reclassified as 
Assisted and some issued yellow or red cards.
73 de Roger/G3SXW.


-----Original Message----- 
From: G3RAU at aol.com
Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2011 9:45 AM
To: uk-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] CQ WW SSB Contest.


In a message dated 06/11/2011 09:07:10 GMT Standard Time, g4odv at yahoo.co.uk
writes:

so I do  wonder sometimes when I see claims for 40 zones with big q counts
and
high  country claims who do not register 'assistance'.


This should really show up on 28MHz this year, because the time taken to
carefully S&P along the entire Meg that was in use from 28.2 up to  29.2 was
quite long, so making it very easy to miss transitory mults.  I  hope the
checking software can detect the operating patterns of  "non  assisted" 
cheats
by seeing the way their frequency suddenly & magically  jumps onto a juicy
mult.  The first time you could maybe  believe it was by chance, but not
over and over again throughout the  contest.
Cheats apart, it was a delight to be on 10M with such great conditions -
lets hope it lasts for the CW leg.
73 Derek G3RAU

_______________________________________________
UK-Contest mailing list
UK-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest