[UK-CONTEST] HF CW Field Day / G0CKV

[Stewart Bryant]

More of the committee work should be done in the public domain
and not behind closed doors.

There is no reason for a large ctte if the contest design happened
by consultation, and there is no reason why the adjudication pool
should come exclusively from the contest ctte.

Stewart/G3YSX

On 18/04/2012 10:45, Chris G3SJJ wrote:
> Adrian, obviously there would need to be a vacancy created by someone leaving the Contest Committee. The are currently 17 members covering VHF and HF
> events. I guess if one of them resigned, the position would be advertised in RadCom, and/or on this Reflector.
>
> In some ways you may be correct about "by invitation," in that if, say for example, Q G3WRR left, they may want to look for an experienced CW FD
> person to take over, or again if one of the VHF guys left the same could apply.
>
> Could I also suggest that sarcastic comments wouldn't particularly be helpful in getting positively noticed to work in the team!
>
> Chris G3SJJ  (Member of the former HFCC 1985-2000)
>
>
>
> On 17/04/2012 22:34, UK Contest wrote:
>> I have been waiting for news about SSB FD rules, and now take it that this years event will use the previous rule set.
>>
>> I can get on with planning my entry.
>>
>> Turning to Olof's comments, I agree with his observations and comments. I hope that that they are noted !
>>
>> By the way, I am still waiting to understand how people get onto the RSGB HFCC. As far as I can make out its by invitation. Is this what Olof means by " back room deals among a privileged inner circle" ?
>>
>> Who do I get the invite from then ?
>>
>> 73
>>
>> Adrian MW1LCR / GW9X
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> UK-Contest mailing list
>> UK-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>>
> _______________________________________________
> UK-Contest mailing list
> UK-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>