[UK-CONTEST] Re VHFNFD
Clive GM3POI
gm3poi2 at btinternet.com
Sat Apr 21 02:31:41 PDT 2012
John,
Nothing at all wrong with that, but they should not be moaning about
the fact they are where they are.
Without improvement they WILL just get left behind and end wanting rigs
consisting of 807s and AR88 or the modern equivalent. 73 Clive GM3POI
-----Original Message-----
From: uk-contest-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:uk-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of John G3UUT
Sent: 21 April 2012 09:24
To: uk-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] Re VHFNFD
Chris, Stewart (GM4AFF) and Clive, I have to profoundly disagree with
you all on this.
Every group should be thinking
after every contest 'how can we improve our score next time?'
Why? If a group just enjoys a weekend in the country and a barbecue with
a bit of radio thrown in that's fine by me. The main point is that they
are there, enjoying themselves, doing amateur radio and providing
stations for the more competitive groups to work. They may also be
nurturing future contesters and amateurs which they certainly wouldn't
be if they weren't there. What does it matter if they end up in the
bottom of the table? VHF contests would be awful if only the competitive
stations entered - we would all work each other in the first hour and
that would be it. I agree that we should structure the sections as best
we can to encourage people to improve but we must not put down people
who for one reason or another are happy to stay in the bottom half of
the results table - the great thing is that they have entered. I'm
never going to do much good from home in VHF contests because of my poor
location but it doesn't stop me coming on.
73 John G3UUT
On 21/04/2012 07:26, zl1ct1 at gm7v.com wrote:
> Hello John G8IYS
>
> I'm sorry but I think your response to Stewart GM4AFF's posting just
> highlights some of the problems.
>
> Stewart is making the perfectly valid point (perhaps he should have
> expanded more on what he meant), with which I strongly agree, is that
> we should not necessarily reward participation, but we should most
> definitely reward a competitive spirit. Every group should be thinking
> after every contest 'how can we improve our score next time?'
>
> This reflector is a free and open forum, where anyone can express an
> opinion - it's sometimes a bit like an HF contest on here! Anyone who
> takes anything personally should not do so - we all support the work
> of the Contest Committee, but don't expect us to stay silent if we
> think the CC have got things wrong.
>
> 73
> Chris
> GM3WOJ
> _______________________________________________
> UK-Contest mailing list
> UK-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>
_______________________________________________
UK-Contest mailing list
UK-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
=======
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 9.0.0.888, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.19610)
http://www.pctools.com/
=======
=======
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 9.0.0.888, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.19610)
http://www.pctools.com/
=======
More information about the UK-Contest
mailing list