[UK-CONTEST] RE - CQWW CW 2011 Results............

[Dennis Andrews]

Hi Lee,

It would be interesting to know under what circumstances
an entry can be reclassified as a "checklog". The entries
from CR6K and 4O3A were both submitted as SOAB Unassisted
and one would assume that some violation of a contest rule
was detected that led to this action.

According to the published rules for CQWW, where a rule
violation has been found, there are only four options -
red card, yellow card, warning letter or log rejection.

73 de Dennis – F5VHY/TM6X.
=====================================================================Hi Brian,

I know that the CQWW CW logs for 4O3A and CR3K were both made CHECK
LOGS, but unfortunately during the corrected scores editing they were
accidentally left out of the Check Log list in the final results. They
should not have disappeared completely without a trace.

73,

Lee G0MTN
UK DX Advisor for CQWWCC


On 29 August 2012 19:56, brian coyne <g4odv at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Well, Sanjin, E71DX, has certainly done his homework giving Bob  and fellow log checkers some head scratching to do.
>
> As Dennis and -Sanjin have noted the missing logs of 4O3A & CR6K add a note of mystery to these publshed reults. I would have expected our intrepid RadioSport reporter Jamie to have published something by this time, just the sort of thing he likes to gat his teeth into! Looks like Bob & Co are managing to maintain a strict code of silence this time with no 'wikileaks' so far.
>
> 73  Brian C4Z /5B4AIZ.