[UK-CONTEST] Re REAL REPORTS

[Steve Knowles]

As I said, Ian, the adjudicator has to decide on every case individually. 
Depending upon the circumstances the sending station only, the receiving 
station only or neither station may be penalised.

Having a higher than average reverse UBN count is not necessarily 
blameworthy for the sending station. Some stations send much faster than 
might be desirable, or there might be heavy QRM or QRN on them - but under 
these circumstances it is still the responsibility of the receiving station 
to ensure the exchange is copied correctly. Fault can be ascribed to the 
sending station only if it can be shown (or reasonably deduced) that the 
information sent was not as logged.

73

Steve