[UK-CONTEST] Separate reflectors?

Steve White steve.g3zvw at gmail.com
Mon Oct 29 08:44:55 EDT 2012


I'm very much in favour of one forum/reflector and I don't agree with the 
assertion that if it was split into HF and VHF there would be about the same 
number of messages in total. What I suspect is that there would be a 
duplication of whinges, with some of them being sent to both. Of course 
those interested in just one side of the frequency divide would only see 
them once, but those of us who are interested in HF and VHF would get them 
twice.

Steve, G3ZVW

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:52:56 +0000
From: "David Ferrington, M0XDF" <M0XDF at Alphadene.co.uk>
To: G3WVG <g3wvg at btinternet.com>
Cc: UK-Contests <uk-contest at contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] Separate reflectors?
Message-ID: <8FC0C446-1555-48B9-9014-2ADA7A50F0F8 at Alphadene.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Sorry, I agree with Rob on this, I'd prefer just one reflector, not only 
does it keep the number of reflectors, forums and other mail lists down, it 
means we can search just one place for an item.
73 de David, M0XDF


On 29 Oct 2012, at 11:48, G3WVG wrote:

> Hi Rob.
> Good to hear your input, although I can't really follow your logic.
> You seem to be suggesting that because you have interests outside radio (I 
> guess you are not unique in that respect) and that you are subscribed to 
> too many reflectors that we should follow your lead.
> No.. Clive's  point is entirely valid.. Those that want both HF and VHF 
> can subscribe to both.





More information about the UK-Contest mailing list