[UK-CONTEST] IARU Region 1 SSB Fieldday 2012 Deutschland/Germany
dave
daveg3tbk at googlemail.com
Wed Sep 19 18:21:40 EDT 2012
I certainly agree that an aim of Contesting is to develop operating
skill - but I think that is equally important to encourage technical
progress - or should we still be limited to 10w dc input as when I first
entered NFD? I suppose a "skill" in those days was quickly "netting" the
TX to the RX frequency in that pre-transceiver era.
My reference to two interlocked TXs was to CW NFD, and was permitted in
the Open Section for the first time this year, along with an on-site SDR
to populate band-maps. Our Team's skills, both operating and
technical, were certainly enhanced.
I don't follow the inexpensive equipment thread - most stations used K3s
or FT1000s, neither cheap, and in the Open section there is also the
Linear to consider and almost certainly a beam and tower. Some Teams
will always have "better" equipment available than others. I don't see
why stations that don't have a beam/tower and linear available should
not be able to experiment with an array of antennas as we now can in
RSGB NFD Restricted section. The antennas are the one element of a
station that can be cheap. I would like to see those innovative rules
introduced for CW NFD also being adopted for SSB FD.
For our Group, a large part of the fun of Field Days is seeing how much
technology we can set up in 24 hours, I don't think I would bother to go
out if all I was going to put up was a doublet - simplicity has never
entered the equation for us.
I agreed with the banning of Cluster or RBN in CW FD - I don't think
they enhance operating skill in any way, rather the opposite. I think
that FD stations should be totally self-contained and sef-sufficient.
73
Dave G3TBK
More information about the UK-Contest
mailing list