[VHFcontesting] ARRL VHF+ contest proposals: input invited
k9ij at vx5.com
Fri Feb 20 22:54:28 EST 2004
At 08:12 PM 2/20/2004 -0800, Bob K0NR wrote:
>From: "John Geiger" <johngeig at yahoo.com>
> >Well said Mike. I can't see how the new point rules
> >encourage anyone to add more bands. Since a 2.3G QSO
> >would count the same pointwise as a 6 meter QSO, I
> >would do better making a few WSJT skeds than I would
> >adding new bands. Not exactly the way to encourage
> >activity on the higher frequencies.
> > 73s John NE0P
> There is a critical assumption here that the goal is
> to encourage activity on the higher bands. I don't
> share that assumption or belief (sacrilege!).
> I think the goal should be to maximize the number
> of stations active in the VHF contest, without regard
> to how many bands they operate.
I don't disagree with that, but I do think that encouraging
activity on the higher bands is a significant consideration,
but I don't think it's the only goal or necessarily the most
important. But we need to do it.
> OK, let me back off a little bit. I do see the value
> of encouraging people to add bands to their station.
> But I would argue that not every "VHF" contest needs
> to have the same set of bands and/or scoring. Some
> diversity in how the contests are structured could
> be a real plus. We could have one or two contests
> use the existing "Really a Microwave Contest" scoring
> method and maybe the June contest could use a
> "Really a VHF Contest" scoring method.
I think that adding a 'Limited Single' category could go a long
way towards solving that. I never understood why there wasn't
I wouldn't be adverse to proposal 3, except that I think it should be
the January contest rather than June. A lot of the good microwave
activity is mountain topping. You can do that in June, but it's a lot
harder to do in January. (Impossible in some areas).
John - K9IJ
John Rice K9IJ
k9ij at vx5.com
Webmaster, Network Admin, Janitor
More information about the VHFcontesting