[VHFcontesting] Captive Rovers - a mythical beast?

[Bill Olson]

Hi Jon, Ah yes... That would have been Dean, WB0TKJ/M NOT /R because this 
was before there was any such thing as a rover!! So since there were no 
rovers I guess one could not be called a "captive" one! That was also before 
folks discussed the "morality" of contesting. I seem to remember everyone 
really applauded the effort!!! Ah for the good old days!!!

bill K1DY

>From: "jon jones" <n0jk at hotmail.com>
>To: vhfcontesting at contesting.com
>Subject: [VHFcontesting] Captive Rovers - a mythical beast?
>Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:15:38 +0000
>
>Like the dragon or unicorn, is the captive rover is  a "mythical beast?"  I
>think I saw one with my own eyes through the mist...
>
>Years ago, back in the dark ages of VHF Contesting, before computer 
>logging,
>WSJT, FSK-441a/JT-65, Cabrillo, and web clusters existed; when VHF radios
>"glowed in the dark" -  a great VHF Contest station was built on a hill
>overlooking the wheatfields. It was known far and wide as "WB0DRL."
>
>One sunny June morning, the loyal knights at WB0DRL decided they wanted to
>win the contest in the m/m category. To further this cause, they equipped
>several vehicles with state of the art radio gear from 50 - 2304 MHz + 10
>GHz. Operators were recruited to drive and operate these war wagons.
>
>Once the rovers were ready, they were sent out on their journey. Their
>mandate was simple, drive like the south wind, stop in a new grid, work the
>"mother station," then on to the next grid. If any other stations were
>around - work them quickly but don't tarry. Each rover covered over 1,500
>miles that weekend.
>
>WB0DRL came within striking distance of winning it all.
>
>Were these "captive" rovers?
>
>- Jon N0JK
>
> >"The captive rover is a mythical beast...."
>
> >73,
> >
> >
> >Roger Rehr
> >W3SZ
> >
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>VHFcontesting mailing list
>VHFcontesting at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting