[VHFcontesting] VHF-DX logger prob continued

[David]

I down loaded the Rover Log and it is much too complex for me. Does to many 
things I am not interested in. Logging a QSO is not straight forward.  Get 
too many error messages.

Downloaded CT.  It doesn't seem to run on my computer.

When one is computer stupid simplicity is needed.

VHF-DX works fine if someone could fix the band problem.

David




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Zack Widup" <w9sz at prairienet.org>
To: <VHFcontesting at contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF-DX logger prob continued


>
> My personal preference happens to be CT.  It is now free and continues to
> be supported and updated.  It automatically generates Cabrillo logs. A
> postcontest mode allows you to enter QSO's made on paper logs during the
> contest.
>
> Most of the bugs seem to be out of the CTWIN latest version and the
> DOS-based CT version 9.92.
>
> 73, Zack W9SZ
>
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 kevinemtid at sbcglobal.net wrote:
>
>> I also use VHF-DX. It was the most simple and easiest to use vhf logger
>> I could find for the right price. Unfortunately the programmer no longer
>> supports it. I am not a programmer I cannot and will not(because I did
>> not write it) open it to change a few designations the ARRL decided to
>> make. I for one cannot afford to spend 49 to 79 dollars for a logging
>> program every yr. I did use the cabrillo form located on the ARRL
>> website just now and thank God I only had about 50 contacts to enter.
>> I don't plan on doing that again. I'll have to do some research before
>> the June contest or just resort to a paper log.  Dave you are not Alone!
>>
>>   73,
>>   Kevin KA1KOJ
>
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>