[VHFcontesting] FM-Only Frequencies?

[Tad Danley]

That is correct, 146.52 was set aside at a time when it tended to be 
very active daily in order to 'protect' the activity there.
Time to remove the prohibition on .52 along with the requirement to only 
use 'recognized' simplex frequencies.

73,

Tad Danley, K3TD
EM10dq

On 12/12/2012 11:11 AM, Keith Morehouse wrote:
> I believe the "52" rule was written to get "buy in" from the FM crowd back
> when that mode was popular.  There had been many complaints about certain
> contest stations monopolizing the calling frequency and it was felt
> necessary.
>
> Now, the FM band is a vast wasteland in many parts of the country. Maybe a
> re-visit of the rules is in order.
>
> Jay W9RM
>
> Keith J Morehouse
> -via DROID2Global
> On Dec 12, 2012 10:52 AM, "Paul Decker" <kg7hf at comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> I have to admit I haven't read the rules.   It sounds pretty short sighted
>> to me as well.
>>
>> Would that be 146,520,001  Hz that I am calling on?  ;)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm at arrl.net>
>> To: Paul Decker <kg7hf at comcast.net>
>> Cc: Bob K0NR - email list <list at k0nr.com>, vhfcontesting at contesting.com
>> Sent: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:41:33 -0000 (UTC)
>> Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] FM-Only Frequencies?
>>
>> The contest rules explicitly state that you cannot use the national
>> simplex calling frequencies. I think it's a dumb rule, but it is a
>> rule.
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> Paul, N8HM
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Paul Decker wrote:
>>> There seems to be so little activity on FM simplex and on VHF FM anyway,
>> I personally would just call on the calling frequency and not worry about
>> it too much. I believe the argument you presented holds and it's not
>> against the law.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: Bob K0NR - email list
>>> To: vhfcontesting at contesting.com
>>> Sent: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:50:22 -0000 (UTC)
>>> Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] FM-Only Frequencies?
>>>
>>> I like the idea of the FM-only category... it won't make a huge
>> difference in
>>> activity
>>> but it opens up the contest for people that don't have limited vhf
>> stations.
>>> But here's what happens next (based on many actual conversations):
>>>
>>> Me: Hey, Charlie, there's an FM category in the VHF contests. You should
>> give it
>>> a try.
>>>
>>> Charlie: OK, sounds great. I'll look for you on 146.52 MHz, right?
>>>
>>> Me: Well, no, you can't use the FM calling frequency for calling in the
>> contest.
>>> Charlie: Really? If I was operating SSB, can I use the SSB calling
>> frequency?
>>> Me: Well, yes, that is allowed. But for some reason FM is treated
>> differently.
>>> Charlie: Wow, that seems dumb.
>>>
>>> Me: Correct.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Les Rayburn wrote:
>>>
>>>> so what frequencies will you be monitoring in your area? For distant
>>>> questions, it's really necessary to monitor with the squelch off--meaning
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> VHFcontesting mailing list
>>> VHFcontesting at contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> VHFcontesting mailing list
>>> VHFcontesting at contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>> _______________________________________________
>> VHFcontesting mailing list
>> VHFcontesting at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>>
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>
>