[VHFcontesting] The digital modes and the Sept contest

Mark Spencer mark at alignedsolutions.com
Wed Sep 13 15:32:54 EDT 2017


I don't believe I have ever used WSJT-x with my FT736.   I have however used the same interface hardware with WSJT-x and another radio and I don't recall any issues.

In this scheme, WSJT-x just sees a serial port that it uses for PTT along with sending and receiving audio via sound card built into a laptop.  

Most of the time for WSJT-x I just use the USB interface on another radio for MF, HF and 50 MHz.   

All the best 

Mark S
VE7AFZ


mark at alignedsolutions.com
604 762 4099

> On Sep 13, 2017, at 12:12 PM, winger55552001 <winger55552001 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> Do you use wsjt-x with this?
> 
> 
> 
> Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
> 
> 
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Mark Spencer <mark at alignedsolutions.com> 
> Date: 9/13/17 2:05 PM (GMT-06:00) 
> To: winger55552001 at yahoo.com 
> Cc: VHF Contesting Reflector <vhfcontesting at contesting.com> 
> Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] The digital modes and the Sept contest 
> 
> Sorry I just use a home Brew serial port to ptt, plus isolation transformer(s) for the audio scheme with my FT736.
> 
> 73
> 
> Mark S
> VE7AFZ
> 
> Aligned Solutions Co.
> mark at alignedsolutions.com
> 604 762 4099
> 
>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 11:51 AM, Randy Wing <winger55552001 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Has anyone used signalink with an FT-736?  I would like to use it but I have had problems getting it to work... I can go offline with you...
>> 
>> Randy, N0LD
>> 
>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
>> 
>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Mark Spencer
>> <mark at alignedsolutions.com> wrote:
>> Although 1.2 GHz may not be considered a microwave band, I have used JT65c on that band with success during a portable outing.
>> 
>> It allowed us to quickly complete a QSO that had defied several attempts  over a few hours with CW / SSB.  
>> 
>> 73
>> 
>> Mark S
>> VE7AFZ
>> 
>> mark at alignedsolutions.com
>> 604 762 4099
>> 
>> > On Sep 13, 2017, at 7:52 AM, Keith Morehouse <w9rm at calmesapartners.com> wrote:
>> > 
>> > Zack, I think JT65 or one of the JT9 modes would work very well on any
>> > microwave band as long as both ends were frequency stable.  If someone
>> > drifts, which is likely, I there would be problems.  Rapid fading or any
>> > kind of propagation distortion (multi-path, ect) might have a detrimental
>> > effect, depending on which digital mode you used.
>> > 
>> > Personally, I think JT65 is a proper and useful mode for microwaves.  One
>> > of the JT65 sub-modes was designed from the start for terrestrial microwave
>> > operation, not EME.
>> > 
>> > -W9RM
>> > 
>> > 
>> > Keith J Morehouse
>> > Managing Partner
>> > Calmesa Partners G.P.
>> > Olathe, CO
>> > 
>> >> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 6:51 AM, Zack Widup <w9sz.zack at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> My VHF operating is almost entirely portable. I like to go to local
>> >> hills (there are some around here!) I use a deep-cycle marine battery
>> >> as a power source. Except for very brief operations, running the
>> >> station and a computer from the battery runs it down too fast. So I
>> >> don't even bother taking a computer along. I log on paper and enter it
>> >> into the computer when I get home later.
>> >> 
>> >> So no digital modes for me on VHF. I wonder how well they work on
>> >> microwave frequencies, anyway. I hear stations now and then that don't
>> >> have phase-locked LO's and are way off the expected frequencies and
>> >> drift several kHz up and down as we work.
>> >> 
>> >> 73, Zack W9SZ
>> >> 
>> >>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 1:49 AM, Jim Worsham <w4kxy at bellsouth.net> wrote:
>> >>> Hello Kenny.  How is everything going?  Forget decades.  How about now!
>> >> I see this all the time now at work.  The millennials would rather IM or
>> >> email you than talk to you.  God help you if you actually show up in their
>> >> office for a face-to-face.  You quickly become the creepy old guy.  I am
>> >> not sure if that is what is driving your experiences with the use of
>> > 
>> _______________________________________________
>> VHFcontesting mailing list
>> VHFcontesting at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting


More information about the VHFcontesting mailing list