[VHFcontesting] Very poor contest in FN55

David Olean k1whs at metrocast.net
Wed Jun 13 11:01:00 EDT 2018


Hi Mr. N1BUG!

    I know what you are saying about 144 MHz. That has always been my 
favorite band from the time I heard my first signal while standing on a 
branch in our apple tree. My brother and I were using a walki talki kit 
that had a 19" whip and a 3A5 in a super regen receiver. That was in 
1961.  Lately 144 MHz has taken a big hit in activity.  Part of this is 
that the old crew of VHFers is dying off. These were the guys who made 
big antennas and homebrew KWs in an effort to push the limits and really 
learn about the propagation. Sam Harris was a prime example. Others were 
W4HHK, K2UK/ KH6UK, W8PT, W5RCI, K4IXC, W8KAY, W2AZL, and hundreds just 
like them.  They are all dead now and times have changed.  Add in the 
digital phenom and the band is not the same.  My hat is off to KA1ZE for 
keeping the flame alive.

I am quite upset about the FT8 situation.  I could be wrong, but it is 
looking like a race to the bottom as far as I can tell.  It is a way to 
play with no understanding of CW, so it opens up potential DX to those 
with none of the skills that make a good VHFer. The activity then 
attracts others because that is where the action is.  I am quickly 
losing interest in VHF with all the digital modes as it disconnects me 
from hearing the actual propagation. I lost EME and meteor scatter and 
now I am losing troposcatter.   I went to 160 meters in hopes of finding 
a new challenge, but FT-8 is taking over there as well.

I got two bands back up and running with help from AA1VL and K1BX. Art 
operated mostly on six. I made a few contacts on 144, and we did not do 
any digital mode activity at all. He was strictly CW and SSB and loved 
every minute of it. He lamented that many DX grids were only on FT8 and 
he was shut out  as a result. We did hook up an FT8 setup beforehand, 
and got it working but decided not to bother with it in the contest.

I am rapidly losing interest in VHF and it breaks my heart.

Dave K1WHS


On 6/13/2018 12:20 PM, N1BUG wrote:
> Made only 19 QSOs in 11 grids on 2m. Conditions were variable
> Saturday but good peaks with signals from FN20/21 running S7 to S9
> for several minutes at a time.
>
> Activity seemed very low. I listened several times Sunday and heard
> no more than one or two stations which I had already worked Saturday.
>
> Was activity really this low or was it that people were spending a
> lot of time on digital?
>
> I'm now going to wait and see where we are before adding more bands.
> If SSB/CW activity in contests has taken a big hit, I see no point
> in adding 222/432. Those bands would have been useless this time as
> it would have been impossible to find stations to run bands with.
>
> I remain interested in getting on 1296 regardless, since that is
> unexplored territory for me. But that is still one to three years
> away. I have the transverter and amplifier but need antenna, preamp,
> and better feedline.
>
> I find myself more and more disillusioned with operating and am
> becoming more of an experimenter and explorer.
>
> 73,
> Paul N1BUG
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>



More information about the VHFcontesting mailing list