[VHFcontesting] MFJ verions of G0KSC LFA's

[RT Clay]

 I have had a 9 element 2M LFA up for a few years and it has worked great. Mine is home built however and not MFJ. I used plastic electric fence insulators to mount the elements above the boom.

TorN4OGW/5Starkville, MS

    On Monday, January 28, 2019, 10:52:01 PM CST, Walter Miller, AJ6T <aj6t at comcast.net> wrote:  
 
 Byron,

I have also been intrigued by the LFA Yagi design.  I recently ordered a 
Cushcraft/MFJ model LFA-2M9EL and I had hoped to get it operational by 
the January VHF contest.  However, due to construction and tuning 
problems the antenna is still sitting on the rear deck.  The first 
problem I ran into was discovering that no hole had been drilled in the 
boom for the first director. Hmmmm....MFJ quality assurance strikes 
again.  I had to drill a hole with my hand drill at the specified 
location.  As you noted, the solid rod elements are mounted "Cushcraft 
style" to the boom. This is unlike the original G0KSC Innovantennas 
design that has insulated elements.  I was surprised to discover that 
the antenna does not have a connector for the coax feed.  You have to 
make a three-turn coaxial choke balun and connect the flying leads to 
the screw posts on the loop.  Don't forget to waterproof those exposed 
leads to prevent water from wicking into the coax.  After all that I was 
unable to find a smooth resonant point when adjusting the loop size with 
the antenna pointed skyward.  Now I'm considering making or purchasing a 
ferrite bead balun to replace the three-turn coaxial choke recommended 
in the Cushcraft/MFJ manual. I was surprised to discover on the G0KSC 
website that Innovantennas now offers a bead balun to feed their version 
of this antenna.  I'll come back to attempt to resonate my LFA-2M9EL 
when I have time, but for now to say that I am disappointed would be an 
understatement.  Of course none of this relates to the performance of 
this antenna once it is tuned up and put on the air.

73, Walt, AJ6T

On 1/24/2019 5:50 PM, Byron Tatum wrote:
> Hello-   Has anyone used any of the MFJ versions of the 144 or 222 Mhz G0KSC loop fed yagis and would be in a position to provide evaluations of them? I have studied the Innov versions a lot and am very interested in them. I have studied how well they rank in the VE7BQH yagi tables, however I guess the MFJ versions are too new to be included in the tables. I understand that Justin went to MFJ and modeled the LFA's for them using existing MFJ elements and booms (such as on the 13B2 and 17B2) so that new tooling would not be required. I like the 1/4" OD element rods on the Innov antennas. I am a little disappointed in MFJ keeping the 3/16" OD elements but am trying to keep an open mind on this.   Thanks, Byron W5FH
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting