[WriteLog] SO2R with RITTY and MMTTY

[Mike]

Hello Jim,

The audio level going to RITTY shouldn't have much affect on weak signal
performance as long as you keep the level at a reasonable level.  You can
use the RITTY's input level adjust instead of a seperate external input
audio control.  This is one of the settings you should make before running
RITTY with WL.

	73,
	Mike, K4GMH

At 11:19 PM 4/1/02 -0800, Jim Smith wrote:
>Thanks for the comments.  What I think I would like to be able to change 
>during a contest is the audio level into RITTY as I don't think it is 
>working as well on weak signals as it can.
>
>I guess my question is, "Will changing the audio level into RITTY affect 
>weak signal performance?"
>
>Eventually I'm going to have all the audio I/O running through a small 
>patch bay with individual level controls on all the lines that need it. 
> However, that's down the road a bit.
>
>Mike wrote:
>
>>Hello Jim,
>>
>>RITTY works great with WL.  When using RITTY with WL, you can still select
>>the filters from the RITTY window along with switching between reverse
>>receiver and/or transmit and change the flywheel capability.
>>
>>Not sure what other parameters you would want to adjust in a contest.  You
>>should set-up several paramters prior to using RITTY with WL.  For example,
>>the filter size, center freq., shift, etc.  
>>
>>	73,
>>	Mike, K4GMH
>>
>>At 02:07 AM 3/28/02 -0800, Jim Smith wrote:
>>
>>>I also use RITTY with WL.  Sometimes it seems to work well on weaker 
>>>signals and sometimes it doesn't.  (No multipath or polar flutter.)  I 
>>>have this feeling that if the audio level isn't right RITTY doesn't work 
>>>as well as it can.  I have tried running it by itself in a DOS box and, 
>>>with audio levels adjusted appropriately using the settings available in 
>>>RITTY it was great.  Under WL the ability to set RITTY parameters 
>>>doesn't seem to be there and the performance is far from great.  i.e. if 
>>>the relatively weak signal were cw instead of RTTY it would be solid 
>>>copy as opposed to mostly garbage.
>>>
>>>Do you RITTY users get good weak signal performance from RITTY when used 
>>>with WL?
>>>
>>>Am I missing something?
>>>
>>>73 de Jim Smith    VE7FO
>>>
>>>
>>>John Cashen wrote:
>>>
>>>>During my shortened BARTG effort(I even missed XR0X, although I did 
>>>>hear his pileup) I took a little time to compare RITTY with MMTTY.
>>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>WriteLog mailing list
>>>WriteLog@contesting.com
>>>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>WriteLog mailing list
>>WriteLog@contesting.com
>>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>WriteLog mailing list
>WriteLog@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
>