[WriteLog] CT17 replacment

[Don Melcher]

What reasons??? - all it does is have 4 - 1/8" jacks in parallel - I use a
Icom OPC-478 (because I have them) programming cable, a stereo to mono
adapter, and a 1/8 "Y" from radio hack - plug it all together and it
controls the 746 & PW1 just fine! All the other interfaces in a DB9 will
work the same.

Don

W6ZO

--__--__--

Message: 15
From: "wa9als" <wa9als@starband.net>
To: <Writelog@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [WriteLog] CT-17 replacement
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 07:43:22 -0500

This one works great, and has a DB-9 connector instead of DB-25
http://home.att.net/~k1nu/k1nu/Products/control.html

> through http://www.hosenose.com/interfaces.asp They are the equivalent
> of the CT-17, and less than half the price.

These are certainly not the "equivalent" of CT-17, as they don't control 4
radios nor allow interfacing with the PW-1.  Great option otherwise, but the
CT-17 is costlier for reasons.