[WriteLog] ARRL 10m Test Time question...

[Donald Eriksen]

Very good point, Les, in fact, if your last QSO is entered at 2400 hrs it
will be rejected by the log checking software at ARRL. At least mine was in
Sweepstakes, I had to correct the last QSO to 2359 and re-submit and it was
happy.

Don W6FFH

----- Original Message -----
From: "Les, VA7LC" <va7lc@shaw.ca>
To: <kc0czi@midmoskywarn.net>; <writelog@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 7:13 PM
Subject: Re: [WriteLog] ARRL 10m Test Time question...


> Perhaps it would not be so ambiguous if you look at it as starting 0001 on
> the Saturday and ending 2359 on the Sunday, a full 48 hours. You would
then
> need to adjust to your time zone, here on the Pacific coast the contest
> starts at 4pm on the Friday and ends 48 hours later at 4pm on the Sunday.
We
> always used 0001 and 2359 in the military (RN) to avoid this kind of
error.
>
> 73
> Les, VA7LC
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kevin Brown - KC0CZI" <kc0czi@midmoskywarn.net>
> To: <writelog@contesting.com>
> Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 7:05 PM
> Subject: [WriteLog] ARRL 10m Test Time question...
>
>
> > I am planning on working the ARRL 10M test coming up in a couple of
> > weeks... However the ambiguity in the rules has me posing a question
> > that perhaps one of you might be able to clarify.
> >
> > The rules state:
> >
> > 2. Date and Contest Period: Second full weekend of December. Starts 0000
> > UTC Saturday; ends 2400 UTC Sunday (December 14 -- 15, 2002).
> >
> >
> > So...  Is it Saturday evening through Sunday evening (6p-6p local
> > Central time) or is it TRULY in UTC which would be 6pm Friday through
> > 6pm Saturday?
> >
> > The fact that they added the "UTC" in there, and then referenced a date
> > is confusing - especially to me who is used to dealing with military DTG
> > information such as 140000Z - 142400Z December 02 - which is seeminly
> > what the ARRL has stated.
> >
> > I'm probably making it too complicated - but the times provided aren't
> > clear.
> >
> > Just to keep it OT... I am planning to use Writelog :=)
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > WriteLog mailing list
> > WriteLog@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog