[WriteLog] Multi-Multi Network Congestion?

Gary Ferdinand W2CS w2cs@bellsouth.net
Mon, 9 Dec 2002 20:10:29 -0500


Based on tests I've done here with donated M/M logs, I'd say a 10BaseT
network is overqualified to handle the load!

I've personally helped out at at 4-position M/M operation using TRLog's
115Kbps serial daisy chain "network."  The network performance there was
never a problem.  10Mbps is rather much more bandwidth.  Go for a 100baseT
network if you're really concerned. The cost difference is nil at this
point.

73,

Gary W2CS



> -----Original Message-----
> From: writelog-admin@contesting.com
> [mailto:writelog-admin@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Marty Tippin
> Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 7:55 PM
> To: writelog@contesting.com
> Subject: [WriteLog] Multi-Multi Network Congestion?
>
>
> Looking for opinions as to the ability of a 10MBps Ethernet network to
> support 5 or more networked stations running WriteLog in a big and
> competitive multi-multi effort.
>
> Wayne or anyone who knows -- can WriteLog in that configuration saturate
> the network?
>
> Thanks & 73,
>
> -Marty NW0L
>   martyt@pobox.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
>