[WriteLog] fast re-start of WriteLog

Bob Naumann - N5NJ n5nj@gte.net
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 13:02:03 -0500


Thanks for taking the time for your detailed response John.  I do have a couple of questions / comments below:

 
> I expect several will chime in to defend WL in a Networked environment. 

That's understandable, and expected.  However, if I'm going to set up a network of say, 8 to 12 networked computers at a serious DXpedition multi-op, I have to anticipate any and all problems in advance, and be prepared to handle them 24x7 during the contest.  This explanation as background for my hesitancy.

 
> As far as restarting all the "stuff", this just takes practice.  I suppose making a list of what to do would be good if you have guestops that aren't familiar with what to do.  

I would agree, if the task was a less demanding environment, but I am certain that a chorus of "Why aren't we using old, reliable CT instead of this flashy windows thing" would resound from the multi-multi shack in the middle of Antigua, perhaps with steel drum accompaniment. 

;-)

>But once you get used to it, you should be able to restart WL, DX Telnet, and get the networking going again in less than a minute or 2.

At literally from 500 to 1000 or more qsos per hour, this delay can be a major problem.

Also, why do you need to use DX Telnet in addition to the built-in telnet access capability?  I think the built-in TCP/IP cluster access works perfectly, and I love, love, love, the way the bandmap looks and works.  Smooth, smooth, smooth.

The user interface is excellent.  However, I would like to see the bandmap locked to the right side of the logging screen rather than a seperate window.

> I'm not sure WL needs to improve the way this is handled.  It's very good at recovering QSOs and updating the logs etc. 

These features are some of those attracting me to consider making the change.


> Gobble!  Gobble!


Agreed!  Happy Thanksgiving to our U.S. friends.