[WriteLog] RE: 1 pix > 1000 words
eric at hilding.com
Thu Apr 29 05:26:35 EDT 2004
Jamie, NS3T wrote:
> I am all for efforts that would make WL voice keying
> less robotic and to find ways to protect my voice
> (which is my livelihood in radio news...)
I fully understand...I'm a former announcer/dj but also do voiceovers, etc.
> To that end, I sent the following proposal to the
> Writelog team earlier this year on voice keying.
Thank God...another person with Vision who understands the real-world
need. But apparently, like my suggestions months ago, they appear to have
gone down a "Black Hole".
I now use TR for CW, but the local Club uses WriteLog (Networked) for Field
Day which, if it doesn't get enhanced, keeps us in the Dark Ages compared
to what you obviously know *can* be an efficiency improvement.
FYI, K1EA said he would most likely implement these kinds of things
shortly, but that doesn't solve the Club FD situation ;-( Or, what could
be a more dramatic/increased use of WL by SSBers wanting to
go-to-the-next-level in voice-keying.
> Flame suit now donned.
Welcome to my world, Jamie! But IMHO, if others can't understand
substantial product improvement for the benefit of those who want to excel,
that is *their* problem. We should charge Consulting Fees for "Innovative
Solutions" :-) :-) :-) If people don't want FREE consulting, that is
I could be wrong, but I seem to recall seeing something about certain
combinations of letters in WL causing a problem with .wav files...like if
"CQ" is contained within a fullcallsign.wav file, the desired results of
what we are tying to have happen won't ... something else will take
place... "by design". Maybe someone else can shed some light on this.
More information about the WriteLog