RES: [WriteLog] Multi-two cabrillo file

[PY5EG]

Hi Friends:

Before the contest I had the same doubt and I did send an e-mail to our
friend K3EST Bob.
I'm copying the question and answer:


Hi Young Brother!
 
You are correct!  Two tx only. You can keep one log if you link the tx's.
 
I hope all is well as you prepare for the onslaught of Springr. It must be
FB Oms!
 
73
 
Bob
 
 


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
From: py5eg [mailto:py5eg at iesa.com.br]
Sent: Mon 10/4/2004 12:31 PM
To: K3EST (E-mail); K3EST (E-mail); K3EST - WRTC (E-mail)
Cc: Bob Cox
Subject: CQWW M/2 DOUBT


Hi Bob:
 
        Could you please clarify a doubt regarding M/2 rules?
        I understood accordingly the rules that only two transmitted signals
should be used at any time, and this text , combined with the obligation to
have two separate chronological logs ,does not permit the use of a 3rd
station as multiplier station. Am I right?
        Thanks in advance.
 
        Best regards to the family
 
        Oms PY5EG



So on the botoom line. I understand you should aply for M/M


Best 73

-----Mensagem original-----
De: Georgek5kg at aol.com [mailto:Georgek5kg at aol.com]
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 1 de novembro de 2004 12:41
Para: k0tv at arrl.net
Cc: writelog at CONTESTING.COM
Assunto: Re: [WriteLog] Multi-two cabrillo file


 
In a message dated 11/1/2004 5:52:01 AM Mountain Standard Time,  
k0tv at adelphia.net writes:

Hello  all,

I ran M/2 last weekend using WL 10.50 and TCPIP  networking.

I ran four stations, but didn't violate the M/2 rules. When  changing bands,

we went to a new station most of the time. The Cabrillo file  lists 
transmitter 0, 1, 2, and 3. This is the first time I had four stations  set
up. In 
previous contests, we used only two stations.

My question,  will the folks at CQ correctly figure out that this is a M/2 
entry and not  M/M? Do I have to go in and edit the Cabrillo file to show
the 
band  changes?

73, Jerry K0TV



Jerry,
 
I think that your question is more appropriate for the CQ-Contest reflector

than the WriteLog reflector.  I don't view this as a WL issue.   Perhaps you

should send your question directly to the CQWW contest  committee.
 
73, George, k5kg/7
_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/
===================================================================
Esta mensagem pode conter informação confidencial e/ou privilegiada.
Se você não for o destinatário ou a pessoa autorizada a receber esta 
mensagem, não deverá utilizar, copiar, alterar, divulgar a informação 
nela contida ou tomar qualquer ação baseada nessas informações. Se 
você recebeu esta mensagem por engano, por favor avise imediatamente 
o remetente, respondendo o e-mail e em seguida apague-o.Agradecemos 
sua cooperação. 

This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. 
If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the 
addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, change, take any action 
based on this message or any information herein. If you have received
this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply 
e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation.
===================================================================