RES: [WriteLog] Multi-two cabrillo file

Richard L. King k5na at texas.net
Wed Nov 3 11:38:42 EST 2004


There is a slight error in translation here.

Oms asked about having a third multiplier station and Bob's answer was correct.

But that is not what the discussion is about.

The question should have been "is it OK to have additional INACTIVE 
stations available for people to listen on and to activate when another 
active station becomes inactive."

I suspect the answer to this question would have been, "it is OK". This 
maintains the two transmitter rule because only two transmitters are ever 
transmitting at one time.

73, Richard - K5NA

At 12:13 11/3/2004, PY5EG wrote:
>Hi Friends:
>
>Before the contest I had the same doubt and I did send an e-mail to our
>friend K3EST Bob.
>I'm copying the question and answer:
>
>
>Hi Young Brother!
>
>You are correct!  Two tx only. You can keep one log if you link the tx's.
>
>I hope all is well as you prepare for the onslaught of Springr. It must be
>FB Oms!
>
>73
>
>Bob
>
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>----
>From: py5eg [mailto:py5eg at iesa.com.br]
>Sent: Mon 10/4/2004 12:31 PM
>To: K3EST (E-mail); K3EST (E-mail); K3EST - WRTC (E-mail)
>Cc: Bob Cox
>Subject: CQWW M/2 DOUBT
>
>
>Hi Bob:
>
>         Could you please clarify a doubt regarding M/2 rules?
>         I understood accordingly the rules that only two transmitted signals
>should be used at any time, and this text , combined with the obligation to
>have two separate chronological logs ,does not permit the use of a 3rd
>station as multiplier station. Am I right?
>         Thanks in advance.
>
>         Best regards to the family
>
>         Oms PY5EG
>
>
>
>So on the botoom line. I understand you should aply for M/M
>
>
>Best 73
>
>-----Mensagem original-----
>De: Georgek5kg at aol.com [mailto:Georgek5kg at aol.com]
>Enviada em: segunda-feira, 1 de novembro de 2004 12:41
>Para: k0tv at arrl.net
>Cc: writelog at CONTESTING.COM
>Assunto: Re: [WriteLog] Multi-two cabrillo file
>
>
>
>In a message dated 11/1/2004 5:52:01 AM Mountain Standard Time,
>k0tv at adelphia.net writes:
>
>Hello  all,
>
>I ran M/2 last weekend using WL 10.50 and TCPIP  networking.
>
>I ran four stations, but didn't violate the M/2 rules. When  changing bands,
>
>we went to a new station most of the time. The Cabrillo file  lists
>transmitter 0, 1, 2, and 3. This is the first time I had four stations  set
>up. In
>previous contests, we used only two stations.
>
>My question,  will the folks at CQ correctly figure out that this is a M/2
>entry and not  M/M? Do I have to go in and edit the Cabrillo file to show
>the
>band  changes?
>
>73, Jerry K0TV
>
>
>
>Jerry,
>
>I think that your question is more appropriate for the CQ-Contest reflector
>
>than the WriteLog reflector.  I don't view this as a WL issue.   Perhaps you
>
>should send your question directly to the CQWW contest  committee.
>
>73, George, k5kg/7
>_______________________________________________
>WriteLog mailing list
>WriteLog at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
>WriteLog on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/
>===================================================================
>Esta mensagem pode conter informação confidencial e/ou privilegiada.
>Se você não for o destinatário ou a pessoa autorizada a receber esta
>mensagem, não deverá utilizar, copiar, alterar, divulgar a informação
>nela contida ou tomar qualquer ação baseada nessas informações. Se
>você recebeu esta mensagem por engano, por favor avise imediatamente
>o remetente, respondendo o e-mail e em seguida apague-o.Agradecemos
>sua cooperação.
>
>This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
>If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
>addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, change, take any action
>based on this message or any information herein. If you have received
>this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply
>e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation.
>===================================================================
>_______________________________________________
>WriteLog mailing list
>WriteLog at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
>WriteLog on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/

k5na at texas.net 




More information about the WriteLog mailing list