[WriteLog] MicroHam Interfaces

[Bruce Ferry]

That's kind of the same things I'm seeing. I'm using a Yaesu FT-920 so 
the only downside I'm seeing is the lack of a full function keyer for 
CW. I'm sure Writelog can do that job though it's hard to tell how well 
it would work.

steve r wrote:

> beside the fact that you can send rtty and cw without WITHOUT a computer is one of the biggest reasons. so if you use a ic 746 pro or 756 pro 2 or 3  you can benifit from this. other wise i can think of anything else. maybe when they set it up for 2 radios to run at the same time using 2 radio interface cables. thats my 2 cents worth. steve n8is rtty fan.
> 
> Bruce Ferry <bruce at ak8b.us> wrote:  With the Dayton Hamvention coming up soon I have the urge to buy 
> something when I go (naturally) and started looking at the MicroHam 
> interfaces. The "microKeyer" sure looks nice but the "USB Interface II" 
> would seem to do most of the same things for a lot less.
> 
> CW is not one of my modes of operation right now although it might be 
> sometime in the future.
> 
> Can anyone provide some guidance on why would I need the features of the 
> microKeyer over the USB Interface II?
> 

-- 
Bruce Ferry, AK8B

Outgoing mail not scanned because I'd lie about it if I
was a virus sending this anyway.