[WriteLog] WL and CQWW

[DJ3IW Götz]

Hi Tom,

what you SEND using WL depends on your macro (F-key).
If you want to please users of other software set it
up as %D 599 AL AL 4 4 %D%E.
For me the sequence doesn't matter.

73 de Goetz DJ3IW
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm at tm-moore.com>
To: "Writelog" <Writelog at contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 6:12 PM
Subject: [WriteLog] WL and CQWW


> After last year's CQWW, there was some discussion about the order in which
> WL list the ZN and QTH in the entry window.  While the rules list RST QTH 
> ZN
> must be sent, the WL entry window list the process as RST ZN QTH. So 
> (most)
> WL users therefore set up their macros to match this order. The result is
> that exchange information received from other WL users is in the same 
> order,
> therefore easier and quicker to click-on to add to the appropriate entry
> block in the entry window.
>
> The problem was identified by other software users (apparently) who claim
> the rules say the report must be sent RST QTH ZN order. Though it was
> quickly pointed out that the rules do not specifically require that order,
> only that the info must be sent. But many still insisted that the exchange
> must be sent in the order listed in the rules.
>
> So where do we stand on this issue?  There's been no change to the CQWW
> contest module for WL that I'm aware of (I'm running 10.63H). Do we 
> continue
> on as usual or do we figure out how to change the exchange entry order in
> WL?  I know it can be done but I'm not sure if doing so would mess up the
> multiplier info which is hard coded in the WL CQWW module.
>
> Anybody have an update on this issue?
>
> tks
>
> Tom WX4TM
>
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
> WriteLog on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/
>