[WriteLog] Writelog & microHAM compatibility question
Kostas Stamatis
sv1dpi at otenet.gr
Sat Sep 12 23:34:05 PDT 2009
Hello Allan
I have mk2r+ and writelog 10.71
It worls so2r without lpt
A virtual com according to microham protocol does the job
73 Kostas sv1dpi
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Maenchen" <ad6e at arrl.net>
To: "NCCC" <nccc at contesting.com>; <writelog at contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2009 9:22 AM
Subject: [WriteLog] Writelog & microHAM compatibility question
>I was surfing around recently and found a description of Writelog
> modifications by version number. Low and behold something caught my eye
> in
> v10.65 which said there was preliminary support for the MK2R box. Nothing
> mentioned about it again after that (a year ago). Add to this, recent
> Writelog reflector traffic about an Alt-V (or Ctrl-V?) character only used
> for MK2R control. Evidently there have been attempts to implement the
> microHAM protocol. Has it succeeded?
>
> Obviously I'm missing something (again .. as usual). Any knowledge about
> this would be greatly appreciated. Now running XP, UserPort doesn't seem
> to
> work on this machine so I can't use LPT control. If there's any way to
> dump
> the stupid LPT cable, I'd really like to know about it. I'm still using
> 10.67b but I'd be happy to upgrade if this is really working now. OK, yes
> .. I already know switching to WinTest solves this problem, but it won't
> support CQP so it's obviously not ready for "prime time".
>
> Tks & 73, Alan AD6E
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
> WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
>
More information about the WriteLog
mailing list