[WriteLog] Writelog & microHAM compatibility question

Kostas Stamatis sv1dpi at otenet.gr
Sat Sep 12 23:34:05 PDT 2009


Hello Allan
I have mk2r+ and writelog 10.71
It worls so2r without lpt
A virtual com according to microham protocol does the job
73 Kostas sv1dpi

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alan Maenchen" <ad6e at arrl.net>
To: "NCCC" <nccc at contesting.com>; <writelog at contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2009 9:22 AM
Subject: [WriteLog] Writelog & microHAM compatibility question


>I was surfing around recently and found a description of Writelog
> modifications by version number.  Low and behold something caught my eye 
> in
> v10.65 which said there was preliminary support for the MK2R box.  Nothing
> mentioned about it again after that (a year ago).  Add to this, recent
> Writelog reflector traffic about an Alt-V (or Ctrl-V?) character only used
> for MK2R control.  Evidently there have been attempts to implement the
> microHAM protocol. Has it succeeded?
>
> Obviously I'm missing something (again .. as usual).  Any knowledge about
> this would be greatly appreciated. Now running XP, UserPort doesn't seem 
> to
> work on this machine so I can't use LPT control.  If there's any way to 
> dump
> the stupid LPT cable, I'd really like to know about it.  I'm still using
> 10.67b but I'd be happy to upgrade if this is really working now.  OK, yes
> .. I already know switching to WinTest solves this problem, but it won't
> support CQP so it's obviously not ready for "prime time".
>
> Tks & 73,  Alan  AD6E
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
> WriteLog on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/
> 



More information about the WriteLog mailing list