[WriteLog] WriteLog Digest, Vol 117, Issue 3
Dick-W0RAA
dickt at w0raa.com
Sun Sep 2 20:31:07 EDT 2012
Thanks for that info, Steve. Let me know when it's available in the next release and I'll upgrade to that version. I'm due anyway.
Dick
W0RAA
Sent from my iPad 2
On Sep 2, 2012, at 5:19 PM, writelog-request at contesting.com wrote:
> Send WriteLog mailing list submissions to
> writelog at contesting.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> writelog-request at contesting.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> writelog-owner at contesting.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of WriteLog digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Russian contest cabrillo (Doug Nelson)
> 2. Re: Russian contest cabrillo (SP5KP)
> 3. Bug in COQP Module? (DickT-W0RAA)
> 4. Bug in CW Open by K0PC Module? (Rick Tavan N6XI)
> 5. Re: Bug in CW Open by K0PC Module? (Gary AL9A)
> 6. Re: Bug in COQP Module? (Gary AL9A)
> 7. Re: Bug in COQP Module? (DickT-W0RAA)
> 8. Re: Bug in COQP Module? (Steve Woodruff)
> 9. Re: Bug in COQP Module? (Steve Woodruff)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 09:53:33 -0700
> From: Doug Nelson <dougn1 at me.com>
> To: WriteLog at contesting.com
> Subject: [WriteLog] Russian contest cabrillo
> Message-ID: <91EF4D22-2D19-4E8F-94A8-A63F7D41CFE4 at me.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
>
> Apparently no cabrillo support in the SM6SRW module. Do I need to use an external ADIF to Cabrillo converter to generate or will they accept ADIF?
>
> Thanks....Doug K6HGF
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 17:07:24 -0000
> From: "SP5KP" <sp5kp at interia.pl>
> To: "Doug Nelson" <dougn1 at me.com>, <WriteLog at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Russian contest cabrillo
> Message-ID: <C6AA5811FBF6450C8621365FEAFCF575 at KPPeCet>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=original
>
> Hi Doug
>
> Please look on good free conwerter adif2cabr by SP7DQR
>
> http://www.sp7dqr.waw.pl/en/converters.php
>
> -----
>
> Pozdrawiam
> VY 73!
>
> Krzysztof "Chris"
> SP5KP, 3Z5W, 3Z40KP, ex SN5N
>
> admin portalu : http://pga-zawody.eham.pl
>
> eMail: sp5kp at wp.pl
> Skype: sp5kp.
>
> Member of:
> SPDXC#430, SPCWC#49, EPC#6350
>
> GSM: +48 603 310037
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Doug Nelson" <dougn1 at me.com>
> To: <WriteLog at contesting.com>
> Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2012 4:53 PM
> Subject: [WriteLog] Russian contest cabrillo
>
>
>> Apparently no cabrillo support in the SM6SRW module. Do I need to use an
>> external ADIF to Cabrillo converter to generate or will they accept ADIF?
>>
>> Thanks....Doug K6HGF
>> _______________________________________________
>> WriteLog mailing list
>> WriteLog at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
>> WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 12:14:39 -0600
> From: "DickT-W0RAA" <dickt at w0raa.com>
> To: "Writelog Reflector" <writelog at contesting.com>
> Subject: [WriteLog] Bug in COQP Module?
> Message-ID: <FC7AC8E3976E485E85EB8F743EA547D2 at 890727fb58a94f5>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> During the COQP (Colorado QSO Party) this weekend, I noticed a real problem
> with the COQP Module for the contest.
>
> The rules stated that a DX station give their Name & DXCC Prefix in lieu of
> a
> Name & S/P.
>
> When I worked a DX Station (i.e. KP2) I entered the name I was given and
> then entered KP2. WL refused to accept it. I found the same thing with a
> K6 that was in XE2 land. I logged his name and XE and again, WL refused to
> accept it. There were a couple others that had the same results. I am
> running
> Ver 11.02B of Writelog. As a result of this I was not able to claim the
> QSO's.
>
> Is there a different module for this contest or was there a possibility that
> I may
> have been causing the problem with an incorrect setting? Any
> help/suggestions
> will be appreciated.
>
> 73,
>
> Dick
> W0RAA
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 11:26:29 -0700
> From: Rick Tavan N6XI <rtavan at gmail.com>
> To: Writelog user group <writelog at contesting.com>
> Subject: [WriteLog] Bug in CW Open by K0PC Module?
> Message-ID:
> <CANVONAL_-OD_C=zGPxP_wS2+WcCRUjwvcntvwDbNSwpVh8Q91Q at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> The K0PC CW Open module seems to support M (multiplier) fields of only 2
> characters. It is normal to have over 99 multipliers, so e.g. mult 123
> displays as 23. I tried adding a second space to "M " in the fields setup
> but that seems to qualify as a forbidden change - you can add fields but
> if you want to change any you have to start over defining all fields by
> hand. I've never really understood the relationship between UI-driven field
> definitions and custom contest-specific driver modules, so I may be doing
> something wrong here. Or maybe it's a bug.
>
> Any advice?
>
> 73,
>
> /Rick
>
> --
> Rick Tavan N6XI
> Truckee, CA
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 10:59:22 -0800
> From: "Gary AL9A" <al9a at mtaonline.net>
> To: "Rick Tavan N6XI" <rtavan at gmail.com>, "Writelog user group"
> <writelog at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Bug in CW Open by K0PC Module?
> Message-ID: <8FF2DA7E8A614DD994072FC2117E0D34 at AL9APC>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=original
>
> Rick,
>
> Field width is set at the time the field name is created. If the M field is
> only 2 characters wide it cannot be modified to be one character wider. If
> you start all over and redefine all the fields in the module you can make
> the M field wider, but I'm not sure if the multiplier logic will still work
> so it may end up making the problem worse.
>
> 73,
> Gary AL9A
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rick Tavan N6XI" <rtavan at gmail.com>
> To: "Writelog user group" <writelog at contesting.com>
> Sent: September 02, 2012 10:26 AM
> Subject: [WriteLog] Bug in CW Open by K0PC Module?
>
>
>> The K0PC CW Open module seems to support M (multiplier) fields of only 2
>> characters. It is normal to have over 99 multipliers, so e.g. mult 123
>> displays as 23. I tried adding a second space to "M " in the fields setup
>> but that seems to qualify as a forbidden change - you can add fields but
>> if you want to change any you have to start over defining all fields by
>> hand. I've never really understood the relationship between UI-driven
>> field
>> definitions and custom contest-specific driver modules, so I may be doing
>> something wrong here. Or maybe it's a bug.
>>
>> Any advice?
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> /Rick
>>
>> --
>> Rick Tavan N6XI
>> Truckee, CA
>> _______________________________________________
>> WriteLog mailing list
>> WriteLog at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
>> WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 11:02:02 -0800
> From: "Gary AL9A" <al9a at mtaonline.net>
> To: "DickT-W0RAA" <dickt at w0raa.com>, "Writelog Reflector"
> <writelog at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Bug in COQP Module?
> Message-ID: <28A0310FD6A545B2B25E2061FB9FE26D at AL9APC>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=original
>
> Dick,
>
> It sounds like the CO contest sponsors have modified the exchange to be sent
> by a DX station from what it was when the COQP module was created. If that
> is the case Steve N9OH will have to make a modification to bring the module
> up to the current rules.
>
> 73,
> Gary AL9A
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "DickT-W0RAA" <dickt at w0raa.com>
> To: "Writelog Reflector" <writelog at contesting.com>
> Sent: September 02, 2012 10:14 AM
> Subject: [WriteLog] Bug in COQP Module?
>
>
>> During the COQP (Colorado QSO Party) this weekend, I noticed a real
>> problem
>> with the COQP Module for the contest.
>>
>> The rules stated that a DX station give their Name & DXCC Prefix in lieu
>> of
>> a
>> Name & S/P.
>>
>> When I worked a DX Station (i.e. KP2) I entered the name I was given and
>> then entered KP2. WL refused to accept it. I found the same thing with a
>> K6 that was in XE2 land. I logged his name and XE and again, WL refused
>> to
>> accept it. There were a couple others that had the same results. I am
>> running
>> Ver 11.02B of Writelog. As a result of this I was not able to claim the
>> QSO's.
>>
>> Is there a different module for this contest or was there a possibility
>> that
>> I may
>> have been causing the problem with an incorrect setting? Any
>> help/suggestions
>> will be appreciated.
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> Dick
>> W0RAA
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> WriteLog mailing list
>> WriteLog at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
>> WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 16:55:33 -0600
> From: "DickT-W0RAA" <dickt at w0raa.com>
> To: "Writelog Reflector" <writelog at contesting.com>, "Gary AL9A"
> <al9a at mtaonline.net>
> Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Bug in COQP Module?
> Message-ID: <6F41D6E917904F25B091D427B1C2845A at 890727fb58a94f5>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=response
>
> Hi, Gary...
>
> Hopefully Steve is following the thread and will look ito it when he can
> find the time. I know
> he's probably busy with a lot of things requiring more priority. But,
> hopefully he will
> get a chance to look into it.
>
> Steve? Are you watching? :)
>
> Dick
> W0RAA
>
> PS: I received an e-mail from Hal Kennedy, N4GG and he said a Shift/Enter
> will force a
> QSO into the log and it can be cleaned up in the Cabrillo file later.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gary AL9A" <al9a at mtaonline.net>
> To: "DickT-W0RAA" <dickt at w0raa.com>; "Writelog Reflector"
> <writelog at contesting.com>
> Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2012 1:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Bug in COQP Module?
>
>
>> Dick,
>>
>> It sounds like the CO contest sponsors have modified the exchange to be
>> sent by a DX station from what it was when the COQP module was created.
>> If that is the case Steve N9OH will have to make a modification to bring
>> the module up to the current rules.
>>
>> 73,
>> Gary AL9A
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "DickT-W0RAA" <dickt at w0raa.com>
>> To: "Writelog Reflector" <writelog at contesting.com>
>> Sent: September 02, 2012 10:14 AM
>> Subject: [WriteLog] Bug in COQP Module?
>>
>>
>>> During the COQP (Colorado QSO Party) this weekend, I noticed a real
>>> problem
>>> with the COQP Module for the contest.
>>>
>>> The rules stated that a DX station give their Name & DXCC Prefix in lieu
>>> of
>>> a
>>> Name & S/P.
>>>
>>> When I worked a DX Station (i.e. KP2) I entered the name I was given and
>>> then entered KP2. WL refused to accept it. I found the same thing with
>>> a
>>> K6 that was in XE2 land. I logged his name and XE and again, WL refused
>>> to
>>> accept it. There were a couple others that had the same results. I am
>>> running
>>> Ver 11.02B of Writelog. As a result of this I was not able to claim the
>>> QSO's.
>>>
>>> Is there a different module for this contest or was there a possibility
>>> that
>>> I may
>>> have been causing the problem with an incorrect setting? Any
>>> help/suggestions
>>> will be appreciated.
>>>
>>> 73,
>>>
>>> Dick
>>> W0RAA
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> WriteLog mailing list
>>> WriteLog at contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
>>> WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 19:00:37 -0400
> From: Steve Woodruff <steve at n9oh.com>
> To: DickT-W0RAA <dickt at w0raa.com>
> Cc: Writelog Reflector <writelog at contesting.com>, Gary AL9A
> <al9a at mtaonline.net>
> Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Bug in COQP Module?
> Message-ID:
> <CALK10zdH42VAH-2UO-t9ok61+h+YtB=b3zD6KSvKeaq9dCR-mg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
>
> Hi Dick & Gary,
>
> I'd just keep logging it as "DX" for now, or use the Shift+Enter trick if
> that works for you.
>
> I was unaware of any rule changes for COQP requiring a new exchange format,
> so that?s why it was not accepting your DX station's prefix in the QSO
> Entry Window.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve N9OH
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 6:55 PM, DickT-W0RAA <dickt at w0raa.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi, Gary...
>>
>> Hopefully Steve is following the thread and will look ito it when he can
>> find the time. I know
>> he's probably busy with a lot of things requiring more priority. But,
>> hopefully he will
>> get a chance to look into it.
>>
>> Steve? Are you watching? :)
>>
>> Dick
>> W0RAA
>>
>> PS: I received an e-mail from Hal Kennedy, N4GG and he said a Shift/Enter
>> will force a
>> QSO into the log and it can be cleaned up in the Cabrillo file later.
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gary AL9A" <al9a at mtaonline.net>
>> To: "DickT-W0RAA" <dickt at w0raa.com>; "Writelog Reflector" <
>> writelog at contesting.com>
>> Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2012 1:02 PM
>> Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Bug in COQP Module?
>>
>>
>> Dick,
>>>
>>> It sounds like the CO contest sponsors have modified the exchange to be
>>> sent by a DX station from what it was when the COQP module was created. If
>>> that is the case Steve N9OH will have to make a modification to bring the
>>> module up to the current rules.
>>>
>>> 73,
>>> Gary AL9A
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "DickT-W0RAA" <dickt at w0raa.com>
>>> To: "Writelog Reflector" <writelog at contesting.com>
>>> Sent: September 02, 2012 10:14 AM
>>> Subject: [WriteLog] Bug in COQP Module?
>>>
>>>
>>> During the COQP (Colorado QSO Party) this weekend, I noticed a real
>>>> problem
>>>> with the COQP Module for the contest.
>>>>
>>>> The rules stated that a DX station give their Name & DXCC Prefix in lieu
>>>> of
>>>> a
>>>> Name & S/P.
>>>>
>>>> When I worked a DX Station (i.e. KP2) I entered the name I was given and
>>>> then entered KP2. WL refused to accept it. I found the same thing with
>>>> a
>>>> K6 that was in XE2 land. I logged his name and XE and again, WL refused
>>>> to
>>>> accept it. There were a couple others that had the same results. I am
>>>> running
>>>> Ver 11.02B of Writelog. As a result of this I was not able to claim the
>>>> QSO's.
>>>>
>>>> Is there a different module for this contest or was there a possibility
>>>> that
>>>> I may
>>>> have been causing the problem with an incorrect setting? Any
>>>> help/suggestions
>>>> will be appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> 73,
>>>>
>>>> Dick
>>>> W0RAA
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>> WriteLog mailing list
>>>> WriteLog at contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/writelog<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog>
>>>> WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 19:19:51 -0400
> From: Steve Woodruff <steve at n9oh.com>
> To: DickT-W0RAA <dickt at w0raa.com>
> Cc: Writelog Reflector <writelog at contesting.com>, Gary AL9A
> <al9a at mtaonline.net>
> Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Bug in COQP Module?
> Message-ID:
> <CALK10zenzjTjAfX-OV4mhNoXG6QuzhaCCB6BcM3bQmnfLsWwAA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> I do have a new COQP module which simply lets you log DX for the SPC of the
> DX station but when you create the cabrillo log, it correctly lists the
> station's DXCC prefix instead of "DX". We'll get this into the next
> release of WriteLog!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve N9OH
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Steve Woodruff <steve at n9oh.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Dick & Gary,
>>
>> I'd just keep logging it as "DX" for now, or use the Shift+Enter trick if
>> that works for you.
>>
>> I was unaware of any rule changes for COQP requiring a new exchange
>> format, so that?s why it was not accepting your DX station's prefix in the
>> QSO Entry Window.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Steve N9OH
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 6:55 PM, DickT-W0RAA <dickt at w0raa.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, Gary...
>>>
>>> Hopefully Steve is following the thread and will look ito it when he can
>>> find the time. I know
>>> he's probably busy with a lot of things requiring more priority. But,
>>> hopefully he will
>>> get a chance to look into it.
>>>
>>> Steve? Are you watching? :)
>>>
>>> Dick
>>> W0RAA
>>>
>>> PS: I received an e-mail from Hal Kennedy, N4GG and he said a
>>> Shift/Enter will force a
>>> QSO into the log and it can be cleaned up in the Cabrillo file later.
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gary AL9A" <al9a at mtaonline.net>
>>> To: "DickT-W0RAA" <dickt at w0raa.com>; "Writelog Reflector" <
>>> writelog at contesting.com>
>>> Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2012 1:02 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Bug in COQP Module?
>>>
>>>
>>> Dick,
>>>>
>>>> It sounds like the CO contest sponsors have modified the exchange to be
>>>> sent by a DX station from what it was when the COQP module was created. If
>>>> that is the case Steve N9OH will have to make a modification to bring the
>>>> module up to the current rules.
>>>>
>>>> 73,
>>>> Gary AL9A
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "DickT-W0RAA" <dickt at w0raa.com>
>>>> To: "Writelog Reflector" <writelog at contesting.com>
>>>> Sent: September 02, 2012 10:14 AM
>>>> Subject: [WriteLog] Bug in COQP Module?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> During the COQP (Colorado QSO Party) this weekend, I noticed a real
>>>>> problem
>>>>> with the COQP Module for the contest.
>>>>>
>>>>> The rules stated that a DX station give their Name & DXCC Prefix in
>>>>> lieu of
>>>>> a
>>>>> Name & S/P.
>>>>>
>>>>> When I worked a DX Station (i.e. KP2) I entered the name I was given and
>>>>> then entered KP2. WL refused to accept it. I found the same thing
>>>>> with a
>>>>> K6 that was in XE2 land. I logged his name and XE and again, WL
>>>>> refused to
>>>>> accept it. There were a couple others that had the same results. I am
>>>>> running
>>>>> Ver 11.02B of Writelog. As a result of this I was not able to claim the
>>>>> QSO's.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there a different module for this contest or was there a possibility
>>>>> that
>>>>> I may
>>>>> have been causing the problem with an incorrect setting? Any
>>>>> help/suggestions
>>>>> will be appreciated.
>>>>>
>>>>> 73,
>>>>>
>>>>> Dick
>>>>> W0RAA
>>>>>
>>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>>> WriteLog mailing list
>>>>> WriteLog at contesting.com
>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/writelog<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog>
>>>>> WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of WriteLog Digest, Vol 117, Issue 3
> ****************************************
>
More information about the WriteLog
mailing list