[WWYC] Self-Spotting in WAE
Fabian Kurz
lists at telegraphy.de
Mon Sep 15 00:45:33 EDT 2003
Hello YCers, Hello proud lids,
I found it most annoying to see spots like these
Sep 14 DX de
AI1G-@: 3789.0 CQ0T WAE 0423Z
Sep 14 DX de
K2EFV-@: 21271.0 CQ0T WAE 1555Z
Sep 13 DX de OZ1HPS-@: 21295.3 4L6AM WAE
TEST 0937Z
in the WAE-Contest. Yes, it's both WWYCers spotted, I am a member of WWYC,
too, so why should I dislike these spots? Well, as you can see from the
"-@", these spots have been entered at the
oh2aq.kolumbus.com-Internet-DX-cluster. Still nothing wrong with that, but
looking at the originating IPs, these spots can easily be prooved to be
self-spots:
The first spot, by "AI1L" was submitted by 193.126.128.219 which is from
Portugal.
Whois-Lookup:
[...]
inetnum: 193.126.128.0 - 193.126.191.255
netname: KQPT-IOL-DIALUP
descr: KPNQwest Portugal / IOL ISP
country: PT
[...]
Second, by "K2EFV" was submitted by 194.65.14.75:
[...]
inetnum: 194.65.0.0 - 194.65.255.255
netname: PT-TELEPAC-960515
descr: Provider Local Registry
descr: Telepac - Comunicacoes Interactivas, SA
country: PT
[...]
Both calls are not issued (qrz.com lookup).
Same with 4L6AM's spot by "OZ1HPS", originating from 62.168.189.31.
[...]
inetnum: 62.168.160.0 - 62.168.191.255
netname: GE-CN-20030212
descr: Caucasus Network Ltd.
descr: PROVIDER LOCAL REGISTRY
country: GE
[...]
One cannot prove that these spots were actually submitted by the operators
of CQ0T and 4L6AM, but there's no reason not to belive so.
Self-Spotting is not explicitly forbidden in the contest-rules, but using
fake-callsigns like this is clearly a case of unsportsmanship conduct,
therefore a reason for disqualification.
I don't write this because I want CQ0T and 4L6AM to be disqualified! I want
them to realise that this is very poor operating-technique, highly unfair,
and that might lead to the WWYC to appear in bad light. Good operators
don't need self-spotting! We don't need it!
Just learn a lesson from KE9R & co. (http://www.ke9r.com/lids_start_young/)
- They (well, I shan't exclude myself) -- have just the right attitude:
Quote:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did we win?
-- NO WAY
Do we care?
-- NO WAY
Did we rock things, have fun, and blow each other out of the chair?
-- HELL YES
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Contesting ought to be fun in the first place! If you are determined to win
a contest, go for it, but impress your opponents with good operating
skills, not with advanced internet-cheating technology!
I think we have built up a lot in WWYC in the last years. Not only do we
have surpassed the number 300 members now, we also gained a certain
reputation in the HAM-, especially contesting-community. Let's not
jeopardise it by the stupidity of cheating for the gain of just a fistfull
additional QSOs (if at all). It's not worth it!
GO WWYC!
(Factual) Discussion encouraged!
73, Fabian DJ1YFK (maybe being a lid, but not cheating!)
More information about the WWYC
mailing list