[Yaesu] RE: Thoughts on FT1000 vs FT1000MP??

[George Anestis]

Thank you Bill, WD8ARZ, for putting it all into the right words!

I have the FT-1000MP and I'm in complete agreement with your
comments on the rig.  I want to also mention that when running
an amplifier in QSK mode, there is NO reason to use any 3rd party
add-on device to avoid the use of the relay in the 'MP.  The
'MP has the option of keying the amplifier with a relay *OR* a solid
state switch.  BOTH are built in and you use the one needed for
your particular amplifier.  In my case, I have an Alpha 89 and run it
in full QSK mode with the solid state switching in use and there
are *NO* clicking relays involved!  It's beautiful, switching is completely
silent, and FAST!  The 100 watts available from the 'MP is much more
than I need to drive the Alpha 89, which typically runs at full output
(1500w) with ~35 to 40 watts of drive.

The 'MP is the best bang for the buck today.  And speaking of $$$, that
is another area where many are misled.  There is actually very little
difference in price between the 'MP and the D models.  Make sure you
are not comparing apples and oranges when you make this comparison.
The D model is fully loaded and it's price reflects this fact.  The 'MP
is priced *without* all the options, and this is a whole different level of radio
when it's naked.  Put in ALL the options to configure it fully, as the D model
is, and you will find that the prices are very near the same.  Yaesu doesn't
shout from the tree-tops about this, but there are six (6) OPTIONAL filters
needed to completely fill up all the slots and take full advantage of the
capabilities of the radio!  I certainly can't detect ANY drift with the (optional)
high stability TCXO installed, either.

Switching power supplies have been used for many years now in all
commercial computing equipment.  They are efficient and reliable, and
take much less space than the old analog supplies.

I wouldn't part with my 'MP for any kind of $$$.

George - W3ANX

-----Original Message-----
From:	WD8ARZ [SMTP:wd8arz@null.net]
Sent:	Wednesday, October 15, 1997 9:48 AM
To:	yaesu@contesting.com
Subject:	[Yaesu] RE: Thoughts on FT1000 vs FT1000MP??


Steve Wrote on 14 Oct 1997:

* am curious to hear from users who have owned or still own the
* wonderfull FT1000/D and or the FT1000MP and what you think of the two
* rigs other than the obvious 100 watts vs 200 etc. I have heard very
* little comparrison between the two and am considering buying a used MP
* or just selling my FT1000 and buying a new one. I run an Alpha 91B and
* was also curious about any amplifier hook up or compatibility problems
* with amps especially Alphas. Any and all feedback will be appreciated.
* E-mail me at jsjones@rev.net and thanks again. By the way if you have a
* nice FT1000MP you are looking to sell let me know about that as well.
* 73, DE-KS4HK, Steve

Hello Steve, your question is a very frequent one for the last several
years. Earlier archive's for past years may also be of help to you.
Especially because it is obvious that some are rather biased in there
comparisons........hi hi

Check out the Yaesu archives at: http://www.contesting.com/_yaesu/ 

I have strong disagreements with some of the previous comparisons made to
the MP for several reasons. Bias of some of the presenters, early versions
for some of MP's used in the comparisons, and perceptions about why one
radio HAS to be better than the other. Each has applications that suit some
users better than others, but they are not the same apples.

The facts of the matter are that they are TWO Different Radios. Each has
features that the other doesnt and represent different objectives using the
technology available at the time each was designed. Price has come way down
for the MP also.

Also note that the 200 watts compared to 100 watts is only 3db, which is
only a half a S unit on a S meter....but boy does it need a bigger hotter
running power supply. Try running the Ft1000D on 12v..........grin. The
only time that the extra hundred watts is going to be worth it is when NOT
running a linear amp, working a marginal station and using a antenna with
some gain IN the Direction of the station your working.

A current version Ft1000MP has one of the quietest phase noise receivers on
the market today. The power supply is well know for being one that is quite
and has the least effect on receiver noise and rfi issues. Its receiver
stability is very good and drift is not noticable without instrumentation.
Heck, it can resolve a frequency down to .625 Hertz! What good is that if
there was drift???

The FT1000MP EDSP is terrific. The ability to reduce fatique from the
static and Qrm on 80-160 is just plain great! It is easy to use once you
know the controls, and anyone that has read and practiced the directions
for the menu options to use EDSP on transmit find that it can create great
audio. Tune in to 1850khz with your filters wide open and listen to the
near FM sounding SSB audio from several who use the FT1000MP there. There
are many who will pass on their tips for Transmit Audio
configuration.....and its well worth the effort! Dont let ignorance on how
to do it equate to it doesnt do it well..... grin....

The display on the MP is great for immediate feedback as to what is setup
and what is going on with the entire rig. Its very easy on the eyes too.
The filters are not time consuming to select, and are easy to see what is
active and those settings store in the Vfo's and memory's. IF Shift, the
Bandpass and Notch filter adjustments work great!

Current versions do not have a problem interfacing to linear amps and nor
have a problem with setting the SSB leval. That was fixed some time ago and
is a available mod for older versions. I have found the noise blanker and
leval control to be very very effective on line noise and other repetitive
types noise. The leval adjust is good to set just to the point of
elminating the noise with out making the receiver suffer disortion from
near by strong signals.......same as any other radio for that matter.

Receive audio is as great as you set the controls and for the speaker that
you use. You would be surprised how many dont change the various receiver
settings for the type of signal that they are listening to. Filters, and
variable settings make a Big difference. I also find the mode differential
receiving using dual speakers or stereo head phones can make a phenomanal
difference in receiving a signal. Use both receivers tuned to the same
signal, but use different filters and modes on each receiver. Your brain
does a great job of sorting out difference's and almost sounds 3D!

The way you choose the radio is up to you. Once you have sorted the
difference's between the radios, choose the one that fits your needs and
wants the best. The latest version of each is a great radio, and most of
the known bugs with each has been fixed. Which one that performes better is
more a question for test instrument comparisions than it is detectable by
the user. I have yet to find a radio on the market that has everything in
it just the way I want it and is bug free...expecially the newer
models....... The D and the MP are mature systems that are great bangs for
the money.

Enjoy your selection, and share with us what you do, and why you chose the
way you did. Good Luck and have enjoyable listening.

73 from Bill Stamps - WD8ARZ
E-Mail Reply to:
wd8arz@null.net


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.qsl.net/k7on/yaesu.html
Submissions:              yaesu@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  yaesu-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-yaesu@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.qsl.net/k7on/yaesu.html
Submissions:              yaesu@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  yaesu-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-yaesu@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm