[Yaesu] RE: [1000mp] Re: Mark V Field Power Output Test Results

Joe Subich, K4IK k4ik at subich.com
Fri Aug 6 13:21:25 EDT 2004



> Hi Tod et all,
>   I will post the data later today on the Mark V Field for 
> 100, 150 and 200 watts.

If you do, please post the test procedure, equipment configuration 
and current calibration certificate for the equipment.  

73, 

   ... Joe, K4IK 
 

>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Tod - Idaho 
>   To: 'All about Yaesu 1000mp' 
>   Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 10:45 AM
>   Subject: RE: [1000mp] Re: Mark V Field Power Output Mod
> 
> 
>   Tom:
> 
>   Since you apparently have the necessary equipment to make 
> valid tests, could
>   you please share with us the IMD numbers of your Field for 
> 100,150 and 175
>   watts? 
> 
>   Tod, KØTO
> 
> 
> 
>   > -----Original Message-----
>   > From: 1000mp-bounces at mailman.qth.net 
>   > [mailto:1000mp-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Thomas 
>   > Giella KN4LF
>   > Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 8:17 AM
>   > To: All about Yaesu 1000mp
>   > Subject: [1000mp] Re: Mark V Field Power Output Mod
>   > 
>   > Morris et all,
>   > 
>   > I used an HP8563E spectrum analyzer and some other equipment 
>   > to measure spectral purity at 100 watts, 150 watts and then 
>   > at 200 watts on the V Field.
>   > 
>   > There was no discernable spectral purity degradation at 150 
>   > watts and a very minimal amount of degradation at 200 watts 
>   > and still well within FCC requirements.
>   > 
>   > 73,
>   > Thomas F. Giella, KN4LF
>   > Plant City, FL, USA
>   > Grid Square EL87WX
>   > Lat & Long 27 58 31 44N 82 09 51 98W
>   > 
>   > PODXS 070 PSK31 Club Member #349
>   > 
>   > KN4LF Solar Space Weather & Geomagnetic Data Archive: 
>   > http://www.kn4lf.com/kn4lf5.htm
>   > 
>   > ----- Original Message -----
>   >   From: morris wideman
>   >   To: All about Yaesu 1000mp
>   >   Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 7:49 AM
>   >   Subject: Re: [1000mp] Re: Mark V Field Power Output Mod
>   > 
>   > 
>   >   Hello
>   >   Im curious as to how you checked the spectral purity of 
>   > your modified radio?. 
>   >   Finals that are operating at 12v not 30 are going to be 
>   > much more likely to generate spurious emissions if they are 
>   > overdriven.
>   >   WA4MIT Morris
>   > 
>   >   ----- Original Message -----
>   >   From: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <kn4lf at tampabay.rr.com>
>   >   Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 23:45:07 -0400
>   >   To: "a Yaesu E-Group" <yaesu at contesting.com>,"a FT-1000MP 
>   > eGroup" <FT-1000MP at yahoogroups.com>,"a 1000MP QTH e-List" 
>   > <1000mp at mailman.qth.net>
>   >   Subject: [1000mp] Re: Mark V Field Power Output Mod
>   > 
>   >   > My original post below has stimulated allot of 
>   > controversy and posts. I stand by what I already said:
>   >   >
>   >   > .....I've tested the rig extensively at 175 watts on CW 
>   > and RTTY and have suffered no component failures, 
>   > overheating, etc. and no transmit spectral degradation. Of 
>   > course like all mods. make it at your own risk.....
>   >   >
>   >   > I look at it this way. In the original spirit of ham 
>   > radio I'm not afraid to open up my modern expensive rice box, 
>   > to experiment and modify. In my original post I never 
>   > mentioned operating my V Field at 200 watts but it did hold 
>   > up very well with no overheating etc. at 175 watts on CW and 
>   > RTTY, as an experiment. Why did it hold up so well? It's 
>   > because the rig is better engineered and has better specs. 
>   > then advertised and a certain amount of "appliance operator" 
>   > headroom is built in. 
>   >   >
>   >   > Am I stressing the rig? Maybe so but if it blows up I'll 
>   > fix it and/or buy another one. One ham posted in response to 
>   > my original post, to paraphrase, "Real Ham's understand how 
>   > electronics work and don't turn up the power on their rig". I 
>   > say "Real Ham's" are not afraid to experiment. 
>   >   >
>   >   > In any event, in my day to day operations I never run my 
>   > V Field above 125 watts. I originally tweaked up the power 
>   > output because from the factory my V Field only put out 90 
>   > watts on 160 meters and I needed 125 watts to drive my old 
>   > linear to 800 watts.
>   >   >
>   >   > 73,
>   >   > Thomas F. Giella, KN4LF
>   >   > Plant City, FL, USA
>   >   > Grid Square EL87WX
>   >   > Lat & Long 27 58 31 44N 82 09 51 98W
>   >   >
>   >   > PODXS 070 PSK31 Club Member #349
>   >   >
>   >   > KN4LF Solar Space Weather & Geomagnetic Data Archive: 
>   > http://www.kn4lf.com/kn4lf5.htm
>   >   >   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   >   >   From: Thomas Giella KN4LF 
>   >   >   To: a Yaesu E-Group ; a 1000MP QTH e-List ; 
>   > FT-1000MP at yahoogroups.com 
>   >   >   Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 6:28 PM
>   >   >   Subject: Mark V Field Power Output Mod
>   >   >
>   >   > 
>   >   >   Justin et all,
>   >   > 
>   >   >   The Mark V Field power modification is simple but it 
>   > will attract naysayers that will warn of power supply 
>   > damage/failure, finals failure, degraded transmitted spectral 
>   > purity, etc. 
>   >   > 
>   >   >   Pop the top and bottom covers. Gently turn the rig 
>   > upside down on a hard surface with the front of the rig 
>   > facing you. There are three boards visible. One is the 
>   > "Control" board on the left side, the "AF" board on the back 
>   > right side and the "IF/Filter" board on the front right side. 
>   > Go to VR3003 on the AF board and turn it clockwise. It's 
>   > marked "RF Power" (I think it was). Fully clockwise gives you 
>   > 190 watts in the CW mode on 14200 kc, 200 watts on 1845 kc 
>   > and 180 watts on 28400 kc. Of course connect an antenna with 
>   > low VSWR or a good dummy load.
>   >   > 
>   >   >   I've tested the rig extensively at 175 watts on CW and 
>   > RTTY and have suffered no component failures, overheating, 
>   > etc. and no transmit spectral degradation. Of course like all 
>   > mods. make it at your own risk.
>   >   >
>   >   >
>   >   >
>   >   > 
>   >   >     ---
>   >   >     Outgoing mail is certified virus free by Grisoft AVG 6.0.
>   >   >     Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>   >   >     Version: 6.0.734 / Virus Database: 488 - Release 
>   > Date: 8/4/2004
>   >   > _______________________________________________
>   >   > 1000mp mailing list
>   >   > 1000mp at mailman.qth.net
>   >   > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp
>   >   > 
>   > 
>   >   --
>   >   _______________________________________________
>   >   Find what you are looking for with the Lycos Yellow Pages
>   >   
>   > http://r.lycos.com/r/yp_emailfooter/http://yellowpages.lycos.c
>   > om/default.asp?SRC=lycos10
>   > 
>   >   _______________________________________________
>   >   1000mp mailing list
>   >   1000mp at mailman.qth.net
>   >   http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp
>   > 
>   > 
>   >   ---
>   >   Outgoing mail is certified virus free by Grisoft AVG 6.0.
>   >   Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>   >   Version: 6.0.734 / Virus Database: 488 - Release Date: 
>   > 8/5/2004 _______________________________________________
>   > 1000mp mailing list
>   > 1000mp at mailman.qth.net
>   > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp
>   > 
> 
>   _______________________________________________
>   1000mp mailing list
>   1000mp at mailman.qth.net
>   http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp
> 
> 
>   ---
>   Outgoing mail is certified virus free by Grisoft AVG 6.0.
>   Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>   Version: 6.0.734 / Virus Database: 488 - Release Date: 8/5/2004
> _______________________________________________
> 1000mp mailing list
> 1000mp at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp
> 



More information about the Yaesu mailing list