>Rich Measures wrote:
>>
>>When one calculates the admittance and parallel-equivalent resistance
>>(Rp) of the VHF suppressor's Ls/Rs parallel circuit, one finds that as Rs
>>and Ls Increase, the resultant Rp Decreases. Thusly, Rp could be
>>decreased if the existing 100 ohm Rs were replaced by 250 ohms. However,
>>if the 100 ohm resistor were paralleled by a 250 ohm resistor, as Mr.
>>Stewart suggests, the resultant 71 ohms of Rs Increases Rp, which would
>>move the Rp curves farther apart.
>>
>Sorry, Rich, that's flat-out wrong. I wonder if you truly understand
>series-parallel transformations.
>
If my series-parallel transformation method is wrong, Mr. White, then:
1. I managed to fool the entire technical review board at *QST*
Magazine. {March, 1989 issue of *QST*}
2. the Hewlett-Packard Model 4191A RF Impedance Analyzer that Wes used
is wrong.
3. the Third Edition of Herbert W. Jackson's *Introduction to Electric
Circuits* is wrong. {pp. 376-7, "sect. 13-8, "Impedance and Admittance"}
cheers
Rich...
R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|