>Rich Measures wrote:
>>If my series-parallel transformation method is wrong, Mr. White, then:
>>1. I managed to fool the entire technical review board at *QST*
>>Magazine. {March, 1989 issue of *QST*}
>>
>Not having the whole article to hand, I can't comment on that.
>
>>2. the Hewlett-Packard Model 4191A RF Impedance Analyzer that Wes used
>>is wrong.
>>
>No, just your interpretation,
What interpretation?: Either my Rp calculations agree with the HP
analyer's or they don't.
> which is not the same as Wes's or almost everybody else's.
No one on AMPS has stated that they performed Y and Rp calculations for a
Ls/Rs vhf suppressor.
>>3. the Third Edition of Herbert W. Jackson's *Introduction to Electric
>>Circuits* is wrong. {pp. 376-7, "sect. 13-8, "Impedance and Admittance"}
>>
>Once again I think the answer is, no, just your interpretation.
>
What am I interpreting if if I work 'em the way Mr. Jackson works 'em.
Sample problem: Part I: Ls = 200nH, Rs = 200 ohms, f = 100MHz. What
is the Admittance, Y, Mr. White? A running description of your solution
would be helpful.
- thanks
>.............
cheers
Rich...
R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|