Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

R: R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: R: R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?
From: Maurizio Panicara" <i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara)
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 23:26:47 +0200
Peter,

finally, let us know how the resonance of a PI network, that's not a
bandpass device, enters in the design of an Amplifier PI and, in the case
you've the answer, how people can get in trouble when not calculating it.
This will definitely set a meaning or an end to the debate.

73,
Mauri I4JMY




-----Messaggio Originale-----
Da: Peter Chadwick <Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com>
A: 'amps' <amps@contesting.com>; 'Maurizio Panicara' <i4jmy@iol.it>
Data invio: venerdì 6 agosto 1999 10.43
Oggetto: RE: R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?


> I've been an RF professional for 35 years now, and I'm still learning
(self
> training) through doing things in amateur radio.  But if you let loose
> thinking, poor approximations, and bad definitions into a discussion, it
can
> lead people (professional and true amateur alike)  into trouble. Like
> 'resonant frequencies' of low Q matching circuits.
>
> 73
>
> Peter G3RZP
>
>
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
> Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
> Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>
>




--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>