R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?

To:	<amps@contesting.com>
Subject:	R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?
From:	mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike)
Date:	Thu, 5 Aug 1999 13:00:44 -0400


> 
> Rich says:
> 
The Eimac definition of R/XC1 is one.  The other definition of Q
is a lot more complicated and gives a different result.  I use Eimac Q.
I am lazy.  
> 

"a different result" , huh?
That says a lot.

Mike N2MG

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, (continued) R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, Rich Measures [AMPS] Pi-Net math, Radio WC6W R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, Peter Chadwick R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, Rich Measures R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, Peter Chadwick R: R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, <i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara) R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, Peter Chadwick R: R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, <i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara) R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, Rich Measures R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, Peter Chadwick R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, Gilmer, Mike <= R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, Rich Measures R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, Rich Measures R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, Rich Measures R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, Peter Chadwick R: R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, <i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara) R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, Peter Chadwick [AMPS] Rich's Q meaning, Tom Rauch

Previous by Date:	R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, Peter Chadwick
Next by Date:	R: R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, <i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara)
Previous by Thread:	R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, Peter Chadwick
Next by Thread:	R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, Rich Measures
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]