Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?
From: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 05:16:24 -0700


>
>Rich asks:
>
>       >?  Do you believe that a Pi-network is resonant on the working
>>frequency, Peter?
>
>Yes - by my definition of resonance, which is that a particular frequency
>designated the resonant frequency, in a network consisting of inductive,
>capacitive and resistive elements, the applied voltage and current are in
>phase.
>
?  Would this sort of resonance be likely to register on a dipmeter?

>The advantage of this definition of resonance is that it eliminates the
>different answers that you get for parallel networks if you adopt other
>definitions. e.g. the frrequency for maximum current in parallel circuit is
>not the same as for maximum impedance, etc. That's why I asked about your
>definition of resonance, Rich.
>
>73
>
>Peter G3RZP
>
>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
>Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
>Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
>Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>



Rich...

R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures  


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>