Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Network analysis of suppressors

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Network analysis of suppressors
From: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 07:01:15 -0600
on 3/2/00 10:37 PM, measures at 2@vc.net wrote:

> Everything evil in the world, as disappointing as this may be to you,
>> is not a parasitic. As a matter of fact, bangs caused by parasitics
>> alone are most likely about zero percent.
> 
> Then why do people find that the vhf suppressor R  is greatly higher in
> resistance after a big-bang?

What was the condition of the resistors BEFORE the big bang, Rich?  Unless
you or anyone measured them right before, we have no we of knowing do we?
The fact that they are bad when measured is circumstantial evidence.  It
would never hold up in a court of law.  Unless you specifically know what
their state was prior to the "bang" then you cannot comment on what caused
their state after the "bang."

The resistors could have been bad already from heating effects, age, etc.

73,

Jon
KE9NA

-------------------------------------
Jon Ogden
KE9NA

Member:  ARRL, AMSAT, DXCC, NRA

http://www.qsl.net/ke9na

"A life lived in fear is a life half lived."


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>