Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Review of Antenna Tuner from Dayton

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Review of Antenna Tuner from Dayton
From: 2@vc.net (2)
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 11:24:59 -0700
>
>
>> My first stop was to look at the Ameritron/MFJ/Vectronics units.  After
>> all, they are the most prolific tuners out there right now.  Upon looking
>> at all these units, I found that the plate spacing on their caps were no
>> better than what my Heathkit had.  Even their highest power units had caps
>> with the same spacing.  It is interesting to note that later I noticed
>> that the Ameritron tuner rated for 1200 Watts has larger cap spacing than
>> the ones that are more expensive and rated for higher power!
>
>Well Jon, it might be advisable to spend time looking at voltages in 
>T network tuners. If you run the numbers, you'll see the largest 
>problems causing arcing are excessive Q on the low bands. 
>Excessive Q is caused by not having enough capacitance.
>
/\  More C (and less L) usually means more circulating current - which in 
turn means higher Q.  

> ...

cheers

-  R. L. Measures, 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.  
end


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>