Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Review of Antenna Tuner from Dayton

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Review of Antenna Tuner from Dayton
From: Carsten.Esch@APPELLO.DE (Carsten Esch)
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:20:44 +0200
...

if you are looking for a BIG tuner that will not arc have a look here:
http://www.helmut-singer.de/stock/1367096816.html

Regards,

Carsten, DL6LAU

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Christensen [SMTP:paulc@mediaone.net]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 20. Juni 2001 14:18
> To:   amps@contesting.com
> Subject:      Re: [AMPS] Review of Antenna Tuner from Dayton
> 
> 
> > Good point.  This sucker is well built.  The caps are very large.
> Again,
> > I've not seen a better built unit.  Of course, the Nye Viking unit may
> be
> > bigger and better, but it costs nearly $1000 too.
> 
> The Palstar AT4K looks like a great, well-built tuner.  I was considering
> one recently until I ran across an ad from John Bliss in Electric Radio
> which describes a high power balanced/unbalanced tuner using
> industrial-strength components, including vacuum caps.  It's also in the
> kilobuck category.  The tuner is truly balanced and looks like it wouldn't
> have any trouble well into the multi-KW range.  A remote controlled,
> motorized version is also available.  Here's the link to find out more...
> 
> http://airwaterkinginc.purification.com/bzmmremotemotor.html
> 
> -Paul, W9AC
> 
> 
> 
> --
> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
> Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>