>At 10:55 AM 9/28/01 -0700, you wrote:
>>What, exactly, is the issue? Does Eimac even still manufacture a 3-500Z?
// The question is why hasn't Mr. Rauch published the alleged Eimac
authorization for 500mA?
>The issue is ONLY that Rich brings up anything bad he can direct at Tom,
>given the slightest excuse.
// Tom's assertion that 300-ohms/V of equalizer R is correct has no
basis in any info I've seen from electrolytic capacitor manufactures. It
would have made no difference who said it. As I see it, anyone -
including yours truly - who provides bum dope should be thoroughly
> The question was about Capacitors, and
>equalizing resistors, and Rich had no clear defense for his position (or he
>would have given it) so- as unsual, he attacked ages old imaginary slights
>as a diversion and as revenge for old scores.
// The defense is that MOF 100k-ohms 3Wers are known to work for
equalizing 200uF - 470uF, 450V electrolytic filter capacitors - without
roasting such. We have sold over 7k 100k/3w equalizer resistors, and so
far there have been no reported problems. Typically, these resistors are
better than +/- 0.2% of 100k-ohms.
>Both the subjects he brought up have been covered here, but he refuses to
>He is an obsessed person, who (long ago) had a lot to give the community,
>but, now, cannot be believed on any technical subject because his motives
>are always suspect. One doesn't know if he has a valid position, or is just
>trying to hit out to make someone else look bad. His normal reply is
>usually cryptic, making little sense.
// Negative feedback is Good for a discussion group because it tends to
reduce distortion from self-declared experts, and it can keep some folks
from wasting money.
// Bill -- Do you believe that AC Circuit Analysis does not work with
L/R parasitic suppressors?
>Bill Aycock ...
- R. L. Measures, 805.386.3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures.
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com