Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] SB220

To: "Mike Hyder --N4NT--" <N4NT_Mike.Hyder@CHARTER.NET>,"ZL2AAA" <zl2aaa@paradise.net.nz>,"Amps Reflector" <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] SB220
From: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 06:40:31 -0500
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Mike Hyder's comments are very thorough and right on. I would just add four points:

-- The Harbach parasitic supressor mods are based on Rich Measures' work. I took them out of my amplifier years ago and experienced no loss of stability. I should mention, in fairness, that my amp was very carefully built by an old-timer who did it all very well -- others might not be so good, and stability could suffer as a result.

-- The instant-on capability of the 3-500Zs is a great feature, particularly for contesting and DXing.

-- These tubes also seem to have a lot more "headroom" in the grid current department than most of the "more modern" ceramic triodes. I have read recently that some users of modern amps find themselves having constant problems with switching among antennas that are not all 50 ohms, or darned close. Switch antennas, transmit, and the grid current protection will trip because the loading setting for one antenna is not the same as that for another. By contrast, my SB-220 has almost 100 ma of grid current margin in normal operation. I can switch antennas on a given band with no fear of exceeding its limits.

-- The wide impedance matching range of the SB-220's output circuit has been a happy surprise. For example, I run a dipole parasitic array on 80 meters, which is cut for the CW band. Up in the 75 meter DX window the SWR is around 3:1, and yet the SB-220 will tune and match it correctly. The "active antenna tuner" also works with my 40-meter yagi up in the phone band, and in other non-optimum situations.

73, Pete N4ZR

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>