Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[Amps] AC or DC better for indirectly heated cathodes?

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [Amps] AC or DC better for indirectly heated cathodes?
From: "A.J Moss" <linear.amplifier@ntlworld.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 13:09:00 -0000
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Hello amps group,

         I'm in the final throws of getting my 'does all' PSU ready for my 
first new amp. It's a VHF stripline parallel pair of triodes from the GI-7 
family, to a design by YU1AW.

         Now I'm in a fix over this, and thought I'd cast this one out to get 
some opinion. I want to run the heater (I was almost tempted to say filament 
then :-) ) at the optimal voltage for the tubes (from what I gather, it's got 
to be experimentally found by backing off volts until Po starts to drop, and 
going from there). 

    The original design uses AC for the heaters and connects both the tubes in 
parallel with copper strapping for 12.6V AC.  The original design also uses a 
10 Ohm, 10W pot to adjust heater voltage in the primary of the heater 
transformer. A 10R 10W part like that isn't easily found here.

    If I were to make a floating adjustable regulated DC supply, I could use an 
ordinary pot to control the heater volts, meter it, and have a fine adjustment 
to within ca. 1V either way to set optimum heater volts. I could also then add 
a current limiting option on the regulator to limit inrush at switch-on

    Are there benefits, advantages, or just risks of using such a scheme? 
Constant unvarying power at the heaters seems good, but is 'less' 'more' to use 
the cliche.

73 and thanks for any input

Adam


        
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>