Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] AC or DC better for indirectly heated cathodes?

To: "Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>," AMPS" <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] AC or DC better for indirectly heated cathodes?
From: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 07:03:06 -0800
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>

>R. Measures wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Wednesday 19 November 2003 13:09, A.J Moss wrote:
>>>snip
>>>>     If I were to make a floating adjustable regulated DC supply, I could
>>>> use an ordinary pot to control the heater volts, meter it, and have a fine
>>>> adjustment to within ca. 1V either way to set optimum heater volts. I 
could
>>>> also then add a current limiting option on the regulator to limit inrush 
at
>>>> switch-on
>>>>
>>>>     Are there benefits, advantages, or just risks of using such a scheme?
>>>> Constant unvarying power at the heaters seems good, but is 'less' 'more' 
to
>>>> use the cliche.
>>
>>>Repays itself in no time at all if you're ever going to operate portable.
>>>
>>**  True, but there is no reason to limit inrush-current to heater-type
>>tubes.
>
>Not with a normal small mains transformer, which has some degree of 
>built-in current limiting anyway.
>
>But a voltage regulated power supply will do the opposite - it will try 
>to push *extra* current through the lower resistance of a cold heater, 
>unless there is some kind of current limiting or a slow ramp-up in 
>voltage at startup.

**  So why not follow the  tube manufacturer's recommendation? 
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>