Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Re: matching network

To: r@somis.org, g3sek@ifwtech.co.uk, amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Re: matching network
From: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 10:38:32 EST
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
A cathode driven configuration doesn't inherently cause excessive grid 
current. If proper grid and screen voltages are supplied, the grid current is a 
function of grid bias voltage and drive level, just as in grid driven design.

 The higher the drive level, the higher the peak cathode voltage, the higher 
the peak grid voltage, the higher the peak grid current and the higher the 
average grid current (which is what we are measuring).

The cathode driven configuration also offers the same negative feedback 
benefits as in a triode cathode griven (grounded grid) circuit, primarily a 
reduction in odd order products.

One of the main reasons grid drive circuits are not popular for vhf/uhf 
amplifiers is because the input capacitance is the sum of grid to cathode and 
grid 
to screen capacitances, almost double the input capacitance of a cathode drive 
circuit consisting of cathode to grid capacitance only. The circulatng 
currents are higher and resulting I^2 X R losses are higher in the input 
matching 
network.

At h.f. these effects are minimal and either configuration works fine. The 
bulky grid termination resistor can be eliminated with the cathode drive 
configuration.

As always, "you pays your money and takes your choice"!

73, Gerald/K5GW
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>