Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] 10dB and propagation

To: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] 10dB and propagation
From: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 09:13:12 -0800
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>

On Feb 6, 2005, at 6:09 PM, Michael Tope wrote:


You stole my thunder, Ian. Yuri and Rich seem to be
agreeing with each other about two totally different
things. What Rich was talking about is path loss that
varies as a function of EIRP. In my opinion, this is a
very questionable thesis given the amount of power
involved (even 10dB above the legal limit in the US is
a drop in the bucket - remember we are talking about
microwatts/meter^2 whereas the old sol is in range
of KW's/meter^2).

Mike -- Which is why I was originally skeptical. However, the Stanford Research Institute's ionospheric project used 8171 amplifiers.


Yuri seems to be making the claim
that path loss can be a highly variable function of
location, antenna height, frequency, local terrain, the
ionosphere, the neutral atmosphere, etc. I certainly
hope nobody is disputing that. If they are then they
haven't been on the air very much :):)

In regards to Rich's observations, we need to be
asking several important questions:

1). Was there any time constant associated with this
"non-linear" phenomenon? If for instance the time
constant of the non-linear effect is faster than say 10mS,
then one could expect it to generate IMD products as
the non-linearity would be within the audio bandwidth of
an SSB transmitter.

The time constant was long and was seemingly related to sun angle and serendippity.

2). What experimental protocol did Rich and his fellow observers use to control for fading? Calibrated S-meters alone aren't sufficient to control for fading.

Numerous On-Off sequences comparing the signal change with On-Off sequences from others on the group who were using 10db gain amplifiers.

3). What experimental protocol did the 8171 owner use to ensure that his power gain was really 20.0dB.

The V-gain was x 10.

Old measurements that Rich made in his lab wouldn't necessarily be valid as the new owner's setup could easily have added 3dB of uncertainty.

Not likely because the mains-V was 240v +/- 5% at both sites and no change had been made in the anode or screen supplies. I measured 1200V-pk output into 50-ohms (14kW), and my guess is that adding 3db (28kW) was not do-able short of going to an 8281 (4cx15.....), a more capable anode supply, and most likely a 200a mains service.

73 de Mike, W4EF.........................................



----- Original Message ----- From: "Ian White G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk> To: <amps@contesting.com> Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2005 3:30 PM Subject: Re: [Amps] 10dB and propagation


Yuri wrote:
You guys might try to poke fun at this. But there are many factors
contributing to signal levels received at the other end. Antenna
pattern, local ground conditions, terrain and propagation conditions.
VHFers know about ducting on VHF between W6 and KH6, you drive up the
hill and you can find spot where your signal (few watts) will hit it
and you QSO with KH6. You go few hundred feet up or down and you lose it.


Sure, all of that is true... but it all goes strictly dB for dB. There
is no support for tropo ducts behaving in a non-linear fashion.

Let's not confuse the variable *importance* of a dB under different
circumstances (which is obviously true) with any suggestion that the
propagation medium itself is non-linear.

A non-linear medium would have to mean that your signal was directly
affecting the ionization density or the refractive index of the
troposphere. As I already said, that's wishful thinking at amateur power
levels.





_______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps



Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734. www.somis.org


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>