[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Designing the Cleanest Linear with RF Negative Feedback

To: <>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Designing the Cleanest Linear with RF Negative Feedback
From: "Tom Cathey" <>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 20:29:31 -0500
List-post: <>
Just to keep the reflector updated with info...

I received a few private emails regarding using a chain of hi mu GG tubes in 
cascade.  The general consensus is that it was not a very good idea. One 
reason is that there is grid flow in a GG amplifier producing a varying 
load. My example may have been an exception because the drivers were all in 
class A, small signal config producing no variation, but, the final still 
was GG, AB2 with grid current.  In contrast, a tetrode final in AB1 will 
produce a stable load for the drivers.

Another thought was this lashup was sorta Rube Goldberg with all these 
stages... :-) HA!

Plus a lot of class A power waste vs: two smaller class A tetrodes described 

Another fella  thought that a 6146 was a more stable and a better tube than 
the 6550 for RF. A 6550 is better for audio he mentioned.

So, I am back to using a class A, grid driven,  tetrode chain with negative 
feedback as follows: The 5mw tap from the FT-1000D, into the OPA-695 op amp 
[500 mW out],  the 6146 or 6550 class A, [20V out]  into the 4CX-250/ 
conduction cooled version class A  [300V out]  driving a 4CX-XXXX final. 
The final will have negative feedback back to an early stage.  The 
neutralization and feedback may be tough on the higher bands, but maybe with 
some swamping and good layout I can pull it off.

Case closed.  It's nice to have this good advice and save lots of wasted 

Just wanted to add these notes for the archives.

73, and the best of holidays!

Tom, K1JJ

Amps mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>