Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] 3cx3000A7 driver

To: "k7fm" <k7fm@teleport.com>, "Jan Erik Holm" <sm2ekm@telia.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] 3cx3000A7 driver
From: "crawfish" <crawfish@surfmore.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 14:23:41 -0500
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
That was probably the reason National didn't go forth with the NCX-1000. I
could forsee a lot of problems keeping RF out of speech circuits, balanced
modulators, and the like. Cost of building sturdy amps put Raytrack out.
Their stuff was designed extremely tough, but I want to say they only sold
less than 200 of their HF and 6m amps.IIRC, the guy who owned Raytrack was
in the road construction business and just started a sideline venture.
Building a  one off-deal is one thing, making several would cost a lot in
tooling, parts, etc.BTW, how much power out did the Cosmophone 1000 actually
put out?
                                    Joe W4AAB

----- Original Message -----
From: "k7fm" <k7fm@teleport.com>
To: "Jan Erik Holm" <sm2ekm@telia.com>
Cc: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 2:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] 3cx3000A7 driver


> The first transceiver that rian high power was the Cosmophone 1000.  The
> Cosmophone 35 preceeded the Collins KWM-1 and featured a Collins
mechanical
> filter and 2 built in vfos that could be switched to either or both.
>
> I have a Cosmophone and it is one of my prized rigs.
>
> However, the fact that every ham company that built a high power
transceiver
> went broke is proof that it was not a money making concept.
>
> Colin  K7FM
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>