Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] 160m RTTY

To: "David G4FTC" <g4ftc@hotmail.com>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] 160m RTTY
From: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 10:22:48 -0400
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
>>I don't know how bad the multipath is, and obviously, it's 
>>going to depend
>>on the path length and so on. However, SS Loran (Skywave 
>>Synchronised)
>>LORAN was used in WW2 operating in 160m (How many of us 
>>are old enough to
>>remember LORAN on top band?)

Multipath is the cause of selective fading on AM also. The 
low frequency plus the common multipath propagation all 
aggravated LORAN A, RTTY, and even skywave AM operation. 
RTTY was banned on 160 (as was SSB) while LORAN was primary 
navigation.

That's when 813's were considered high power, and 4-1000A's 
for the criminally insane. A W6 still got busted for running 
ten kW back when the legal night-time input power was 100 
watts or so.

My first Europe QSO's were with G3PU and DL1FF, both at the 
very edge of the LORAN A pulses.

http://www.w8ji.com/160_history.htm

http://www.w8ji.com/boatanchors.htm

http://www.jproc.ca/hyperbolic/loran_a.html



_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>