Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Need Some Experienced Feedback Here...

To: Ed Swynar <gswynar@durham.net>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Need Some Experienced Feedback Here...
From: Vic K2VCO <vic@rakefet.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 08:29:58 -0700
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Ed Swynar wrote:
>
> I resolved to replace the entire padding network with fresh
> capacitors, avoiding the use of any of the older surplus rectangular
> "mica blocks" (which I've had fail on me in other applications in the
> past, as well) --- and yesterday I did just that, with another
> parallel / series combination of six door knobs, two of which were
> rated at 20 Kv! Anyway, as I bench-tested the new arrangement: the
> tuning changed again, ever so slowly, as if by some unseen hand ---
> once more I had to compensate with more capacitance from the air
> variable until it, again, ended-up with all its plates meshed, & the
> RF output down to some 200-watts...

I've had this experience with doorknobs in antenna tuners and traps as 
well as amplifiers.  The usual doorknobs with higher values of 
capacitance (> 100 pf) are N750 temperature coefficient, and they also 
tend to heat up.  So the value changes rapidly.  I've found that the big 
surplus micas seem to do a much better job at 160 meters, where they 
have high current ratings and I've been happy with them.

One interesting fact:  I had an Alpha 86 which used what appeared to be 
normal 5KV doorknobs for padding in the output networks, with absolutely 
no problems.  So either they used better doorknobs, or the circuit 
design is such that the current was not enough to cause them to heat up 
so much.
-- 
73,
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>