Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Tank Coil spacing

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Tank Coil spacing
From: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Reply-to: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 23:56:35 +0100
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Tom W8JI wrote:
>
>In the USA the bottom line regulation is we are not allowed to have any 
>emission, no matter what level, that causes a problem.
>
>This is why Novices commonly received warnings or citations for out of 
>band harmonics. If the FCC can hear it and decides it is a potential 
>problem you are obligated to fix it even if it meets all test criteria. 
>They also worked that way with BC stations. We had an FM station that 
>was half the frequency of a local VHF TV channel's video carrier. Even 
>though well over 100dB down on the second harmonic, we were obligated 
>to shield and suppress until the problem went away.

We have a different regulation in the UK, based on the concept of "undue 
interference".

Peter is the professional expert on exactly what the magic word "undue" 
is supposed to mean... but in practice I guess that both countries' 
regulators will act much the same, and will enforce to whatever degree 
they judge to be necessary.


-- 

73 from Ian GM3SEK
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>