Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] High SWR

To: <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] High SWR
From: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:18:53 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
The original WW2 era RG-8 was built to meet a military spec and the 
published voltage handling only references that spec. It is capable and 
used commercially at much higher voltages. RG-213 has the same 
performance specs as RG-8 and has a non contaminating jacket. RG-11 and 
214 are similar.

Carl
KM1H


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 5:11 AM
Subject: Re: [Amps] High SWR


> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
>
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 04:39:01 -0400, Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
> wrote:
>
>>Why not.
>
> REPLY:
>
> Because ou're exceeding the manufacturer's ratings. Sometimes you can
> get away with it, sometimes not.
>
> 73, Bill W6WRT
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>