I use the Belden catalog as the reference. A true RG cable has an
established set of specs that doesnt vary on a whim.
What causes confusion is the RG clone variants and non RG designations.
I dont know if its improved but Radio Shack coax of the past was a prime
example of a mighty inferior product.
Ive run RG-6 fed inverted vees or slopers on 160/80 as well as 450' of
CATV hardline with RG-11 foam jumpers into 4 or 5:1 VSWR's at times with
no ill effects at 1200-1300W. Ferrite sleeve baluns at both ends
eliminated any hot outer shields. Over 300 countries on both bands as
well as big contest scores attests to my lack of concern when it doesnt
amount to the proverbial hill or beans.
OTOH, I fight for tenths of a dB on VHF and above!
Carl
KM1H
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
To: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>
Cc: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 10:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] High SWR
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:02:24 -0400, "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>
wrote:
>Huh? 600 Volts? Where did that figure come from?
>
> -Rex-
>
> K1HI
> Rex Lint
> Merrimack, NH
REPLY:
2004 ARRL Handbook on CD, table 19.1. As I said in another post, I was
mistaken about RG-213, but the other RG-8 style coax versions are
almost all rated at 600 VRMS. RG-213 is an exception. Sorry for the
goof.
73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|